* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0 release decision
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105132046150.5468-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
@ 2001-05-16 11:19 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-05-16 15:42 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J. Mauelshagen @ 2001-05-16 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:48:19PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Steven Lembark wrote:
>
> > for my part running the system i'd rather have the "production"
> > LVM and kernel releases in sync and not have to worry about it.
> > if i need a beta/inter-version release then i'll deal with the
> > extra issues.
>
> Agreed. If the in-kernel LVM cannot be trusted, I really
> don't see why Sistina would ever want to associate its name
> with something broken?
Rik, that's not an issue at all and sorry, it doesn't help either!
With the help of community contributors we *do* provide the most recent
code with as few bugs as possible at www.sistina.com/lvm as we always did.
Everybody could and can get it from there and established LVM users continue
to do it this way.
OTOH we need a lot of time now to get smaller patches into vanilla.
Therefore we kindly asked for community oppinions to help the situation.
Unless a bigger LVM patch to vanilla is accepted, we need to spend a lot of work
on providing those smaller chunks of patches which distracts us a lot from
other work.
Don't tell me that this is all our fault;
this wouldn't *help* to fasten the process either!
A little trust to accept a bigger patch *and* to sort pending issues
out with the help of the community afterwards is a valid approach IMO to
get faster to the point of an updated vanilla LVM driver than with the
tiny patches approach.
Linus, Alan et al.: maybe you could think about it again and
accept one larger LVM patch. Thanks.
>
> I think it would be better for everyone (users, Sistina's
> corporate image and Linux) to get something stable into the
> kernel before sending out the press release ;)
>
> (after all, a version number change is just a one-liner patch
> away ;))
>
> regards,
>
> Rik
> --
> Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
> However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
>
> http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
>
> Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread