* Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Supertrak66?
@ 2001-10-10 14:08 jkniiv
2001-10-10 17:33 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jkniiv @ 2001-10-10 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi folks,
I'm sorry to involve you lot but I have a dilemma of how to replace a problematic 3Ware Escalade 6400 with another ATA RAID controller due to the known problem of Escalade "losing" one or several drives from my striped mirror (RAID10). It needs a reboot and juggling the drives back and forth before it rebuilds the set. Now that 3Ware seems to be discontinuing the line, this issue probably won't be resolved any time soon and I'm wondering which one of two remaining options, Adaptec 2400A or Promise Supertrak66/100 is reasonably compatible with recent (2.4.[89]) Alan Cox kernels? (compatible == hopefully reliable)
I know that both are based on an I2O architecture so there's some hope, at least, even if there is very little support officially by Adaptec or Promise. Alan himself has proclaimed that the Supertrak works for him just fine, but I presume there are no Linux-based utilities available yet. Is there then any way to find out if a drive has gone south and needs to be replaced -- kernel log messages, maybe?
The Adaptec 2400A is presumably very much like the 2100S SCSI model. Adaptec has released some binary only drivers and utilities but none for the 2.4 kernel line. There are however some beta stage drivers (dpt_i2o) available as source for the SCSI models. Now, I happened to list the symbols of the binary only driver for the 2400A (dpt_i2o.o) and came to the conclusion that they are the very same as in the SCSI driver source! Any differences ought to be small. Now, I'm wondering whether anybody has already tested the driver with a 2400A? Alan?
Yours,
// Jarkko Kniivila, CIO, Ambientia Ltd., Finland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.0
wlsEARECABsFAjvEViAUHGprbmlpdkBodXNobWFpbC5jb20ACgkQlshdxPYU0CZLvQCd
FRTf26MRGbvJ79i6hiXdWwBO9ksAn2nROfTFKpsfOfOROgjHNWPIVmm5
=4bKb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Supertrak66?
2001-10-10 14:08 Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Supertrak66? jkniiv
@ 2001-10-10 17:33 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-10-10 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jkniiv; +Cc: linux-kernel
> I know that both are based on an I2O architecture so there's some hope, at
> least, even if there is very little support officially by Adaptec or Promise.
> Alan himself has proclaimed that the Supertrak works for him just fine, but
> I presume there are no Linux-based utilities available yet. Is there then
> any way to find out if a drive has gone south and needs to be replaced --
> kernel log messages, maybe?
I2O provides the basic info needed to check stuff (it uses an HTML interface
bizarrely enough). The DPT/Adaptec doesn't use this so Im not sure what
its monitoring setup is
As to support
Promise sent me the card, and answered questions on firmware funnies
Adaptec wrote their own open source drivers
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-10 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-10 14:08 Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Supertrak66? jkniiv
2001-10-10 17:33 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).