Re: [PATCH] NatSemi SCx200 Support

[Christer Weinigel <wingel@acolyte.hack.org>]

Thibaut Laurent <thibaut@celestix.com> wrote:
> There's a typo in drivers/i2c/Config.in.
> CONFIG_SCx200_I2C is defined but CONFIG_I2C_SCx200 is tested...
> 
> +      dep_tristate '  NatSemi SCx200 I2C using GPIO pins' CONFIG_SCx200_I2C $CONFIG_ARCH_SCx200 $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
> +      if [ "$CONFIG_I2C_SCx200" != "n" ]; then
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>      this should be CONFIG_SCx200_I2C

You are absolutely correct.  I switched the names around and must have
missed that.  A patch is attached.

Thanks,
 /Christer

diff -ur linux/drivers/i2c/Config.in.orig linux/drivers/i2c/Config.in
--- linux/drivers/i2c/Config.in.orig	Mon Mar  4 01:24:27 2002
+++ linux/drivers/i2c/Config.in	Mon Mar  4 01:25:18 2002
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
       dep_tristate '  ELV adapter' CONFIG_I2C_ELV $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
       dep_tristate '  Velleman K9000 adapter' CONFIG_I2C_VELLEMAN $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
       dep_tristate '  NatSemi SCx200 I2C using GPIO pins' CONFIG_SCx200_I2C $CONFIG_ARCH_SCx200 $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
-      if [ "$CONFIG_I2C_SCx200" != "n" ]; then
+      if [ "$CONFIG_SCx200_I2C" != "n" ]; then
          int  '    GPIO pin used for SCL' CONFIG_SCx200_I2C_SCL -1
          int  '    GPIO pin used for SDA' CONFIG_SCx200_I2C_SDA -1
       fi

-- 
"Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"