public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: matts@ksu.edu
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit netdev stats counter
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:58:35 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020712.145835.91443486.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33L.0207121628100.19313-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu>

   From: Matt Stegman <matts@ksu.edu>
   Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:02:07 -0500 (CDT)

   On 12 Jul 2002, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
   
   > 64 bit values are not atomic so on x86 there will be glitches if this
   > ever wraps over on an SMP machine.  One other engineer is already
   > adressing this for inode values like size; but this would introduce the
   > same problem for network stuff.
   
   One other solution I thought of would be to have an rx_bytes_wrap counter
   in the struct.

32-bit values aren't atomic either, what is the issue?
We don't use atomic_t ops on these counters so they aren't
guarenteed in any way right now even.  GCC is going to
output "incl MEM" or similar for net_stats->counter++, since
it lacks the 'lock;' prefix it is not atomic.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-12 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1026503694.26819.4.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
2002-07-12 22:02 ` 64 bit netdev stats counter Matt Stegman
2002-07-12 21:58   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-07-12 23:20     ` Alan Cox
2002-07-12 22:06       ` David S. Miller
2002-07-12 22:27         ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-12 22:28           ` David S. Miller
2002-07-12 22:31       ` Chris Friesen
2002-07-13  2:18         ` Alan Cox
2002-07-13  0:50     ` kuznet
2002-07-12 19:12 Matt Stegman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020712.145835.91443486.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matts@ksu.edu \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox