public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Kiran <geekazoid@phreaker.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 17:56:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020726080211.3E71E4824@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:56:05 +0530." <20020726125605.A2822@phreaker.net>

In message <20020726125605.A2822@phreaker.net> you write:
> This patch was not meant to be a definitive fix for do_gettimeofday.
> I thought having diffrent locks  on the same cacheline was bad. Atleast, 
> I don't think there'd be any negative performance impact due to my patch.  
> Pls correct me if I am wrong. 

Did you ever wonder why we don't declare spinlock to be ____cacheline_aligned?
While it's probably justified in this case, you pay for it in a slight
increase in size...

> I want to get some nos too .. and probably will...(still waiting for my 
> turn to use the 4way here :-) ).  But, I decided to post this patch 
> as a follow up to the 2.5 profiler discussion on lse-tech.  
> Anywayz, point taken. Next time I submit an optimization patch to you,
> I'll post the measuements too.

Sure!

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-26  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-25 15:15 Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2002-07-26  6:24 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-26  7:26   ` Kiran
2002-07-26  7:56     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-07-26  9:23       ` Kiran
2002-07-27  4:17         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020726080211.3E71E4824@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=geekazoid@phreaker.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox