From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
John Levon <movement@marcelothewonderpenguin.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:15:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209290915.52661.tomlins@cam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D961797.B4094994@digeo.com>
On September 28, 2002 04:56 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > kmem_cache_destroy() is falsely reporting
> > "kmem_cache_destroy: Can't free all objects" in 2.5.39. I have
> > verified my code was freeing all allocated items correctly.
> >
> > Reverting this chunk :
> >
> > - list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_free);
> > +/* list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_free);
> > */ + if
> > (unlikely(list_empty(&cachep->slabs_partial))) +
> > list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_partial); +
> > else
> > + kmem_slab_destroy(cachep, slabp);
> >
> > and the problem goes away. I haven't investigated why.
>
> Thanks. That's the code which leaves one empty page available
> for new allocations rather than freeing it immediately.
>
> It's temporary. Ed, I think we can just do
>
> if (list_empty(&cachep->slabs_free))
> list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_free);
> else
> kmem_slab_destroy(cachep, slabp);
>
> there?
How about this (untested) instead. If we can avoid using cachep->slabs_free its
a good thing. Why use three lists when two can do the job? I use a loop to clean
the partial list since its possible that for some caches we may want to have more
than one slabp of buffer.
Thoughts?
Ed
---------
diff -Nru a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c Sun Sep 29 09:08:53 2002
+++ b/mm/slab.c Sun Sep 29 09:08:53 2002
@@ -1036,7 +1036,26 @@
list_del(&cachep->next);
up(&cache_chain_sem);
- if (__kmem_cache_shrink(cachep)) {
+ /* remove any empty partial pages */
+ spin_lock_irq(&cachep->spinlock);
+ while (!cachep->growing) {
+ struct list_head *p;
+ slab_t *slabp;
+
+ p = cachep->slabs_partial.prev;
+ if (p == &cachep->slabs_partial)
+ break;
+
+ slabp = list_entry(cachep->slabs_partial.prev, slab_t, list);
+ if (slabp->inuse)
+ break;
+
+ list_del(&slabp->list);
+
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cachep->spinlock);
+
+ if (!list_empty(&cachep->slabs_full) || !list_empty(&cachep->slabs_partial)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "kmem_cache_destroy: Can't free all objects %p\n",
cachep);
down(&cache_chain_sem);
---------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-29 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-28 20:13 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug John Levon
2002-09-28 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-28 21:12 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-28 21:23 ` John Levon
2002-09-28 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-29 11:45 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-09-29 12:13 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-29 13:15 ` Ed Tomlinson [this message]
2002-09-29 13:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-29 13:53 ` John Levon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209290915.52661.tomlins@cam.org \
--to=tomlins@cam.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=movement@marcelothewonderpenguin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox