* Re: [BK-2.5] Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags [not found] <200301140606.h0E668L16950@hera.kernel.org> @ 2003-01-14 6:36 ` David S. Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: David S. Miller @ 2003-01-14 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel From: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:30:18 +0000 ChangeSet 1.930.8.3, 2003/01/13 10:30:18-06:00, jejb@raven.il.steeleye.com Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags Is this really safe? Maybe ARM needs to use GFP_ATOMIC all the time for a specific reason, such as where and how it maps the cpu side mappings of the memory? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-14 6:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200301140606.h0E668L16950@hera.kernel.org>
2003-01-14 6:36 ` [BK-2.5] Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox