* 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops.
@ 2003-02-13 20:56 Dave Jones
2003-02-13 21:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-13 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2003-02-13 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel
Bitkeeper pull from ~5 hrs ago.
Something went splat just after booting.
I think this may have happened as I mounted an NFS mount.
Hard to tell, but the box booted at 20:30, this happened
at 20:37, and I started NFS testing at 20:40 which was
when I noticed it.
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: printing eip:
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: c012e276
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Oops: 0002
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: CPU: 0
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c012e276>] Not tainted
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EFLAGS: 00010046
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EIP is at mod_timer+0x96/0x7e0
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: c0147440 ecx: 00000007 edx: 00001388
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: esi: 850fc085 edi: c06436c0 ebp: c11c7ed0 esp: c11c7ea0
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Process pdflush (pid: 5, threadinfo=c11c6000 task=c113d980)
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Stack: c11c7ec0 c0146229 c11c7f04 00000000 00000080 c0147320 c11c7ee4 00000000
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: 00000297 000733cf c11c7ee4 00000000 c11c7f90 c0147426 c06436c0 000733cf
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: 0006ab17 00000000 00000000 c11c7ee0 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000001
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0146229>] __get_page_state+0x29/0x90
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147320>] wb_kupdate+0x0/0x120
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147426>] wb_kupdate+0x106/0x120
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147320>] wb_kupdate+0x0/0x120
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147cf9>] __pdflush+0x259/0x5b0
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c011e5fc>] schedule_tail+0x9c/0xe0
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0107d98>] __switch_to+0x148/0x150
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0148050>] pdflush+0x0/0x20
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0148061>] pdflush+0x11/0x20
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147320>] wb_kupdate+0x0/0x120
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c01075cd>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x18
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel:
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Code: 1c 52 fb 50 c0 c7 47 20 e1 00 00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d
Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: <6>note: pdflush[5] exited with preempt_count 1
Looking back through the logs, this also this bizarre snippet during boot:-
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014a8b4>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x134/0x140
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014916f>] kmem_cache_create+0xbf/0x5a0
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x30
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel:
Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Looks like part of 'something', but the other bit is nowhere to be seen. Odd.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops.
2003-02-13 20:56 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops Dave Jones
@ 2003-02-13 21:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-13 21:33 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-13 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2003-02-13 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1156 bytes --]
> Looking back through the logs, this also this bizarre snippet during boot:-
>
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Checking if this processor honours the WP bit ev
en in supervisor mode... Ok.
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014a8b4>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x134/0x140
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014916f>] kmem_cache_create+0xbf/0x5a0
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x30
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel:
> Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5
, 131072 bytes)
I caught this one too:
Memory: 255056k/262024k available (2010k kernel code, 6248k reserved, 895k data,
104k init, 0k highmem)
Debug: sleeping function called from illegal context at mm/slab.c:1618
Call Trace:
[<c0135353>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x51/0x55
[<c013490f>] kmem_cache_create+0x6c/0x448
[<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x22
Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized
Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
So it's after test_wp_bit() is called, and before security_scaffolding_startup().
Interesting that you didn't get the 'sleeping function called' message?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops.
2003-02-13 21:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2003-02-13 21:33 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2003-02-13 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valdis.Kletnieks; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:14:48PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Call Trace:
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014a8b4>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x134/0x140
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c014916f>] kmem_cache_create+0xbf/0x5a0
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x30
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel:
> > Feb 13 20:30:24 mesh kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5
> , 131072 bytes)
> So it's after test_wp_bit() is called, and before security_scaffolding_startup().
>
> Interesting that you didn't get the 'sleeping function called' message?
Could be that one went out to serial console, but not to the logs
for some unknown reason. Unfortunatly my serial terminal has no
docs, and the 'scroll backwards' keys are somewhat not so obvious.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops.
2003-02-13 20:56 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops Dave Jones
2003-02-13 21:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2003-02-13 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-13 21:31 ` Dave Jones
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2003-02-13 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Bitkeeper pull from ~5 hrs ago.
>
> Something went splat just after booting.
> I think this may have happened as I mounted an NFS mount.
> Hard to tell, but the box booted at 20:30, this happened
> at 20:37, and I started NFS testing at 20:40 which was
> when I noticed it.
There is missing text here as well.
if (address < PAGE_SIZE)
printk(KERN_ALERT "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference");
else
printk(KERN_ALERT "Unable to handle kernel paging request");
printk(" at virtual address %08lx\n",address);
printk(" printing eip:\n");
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: printing eip:
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: c012e276
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Oops: 0002
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: CPU: 0
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c012e276>] Not tainted
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EFLAGS: 00010046
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: EIP is at mod_timer+0x96/0x7e0
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: c0147440 ecx: 00000007 edx: 00001388
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: esi: 850fc085 edi: c06436c0 ebp: c11c7ed0 esp: c11c7ea0
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Process pdflush (pid: 5, threadinfo=c11c6000 task=c113d980)
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Stack: c11c7ec0 c0146229 c11c7f04 00000000 00000080 c0147320 c11c7ee4 00000000
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: 00000297 000733cf c11c7ee4 00000000 c11c7f90 c0147426 c06436c0 000733cf
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: 0006ab17 00000000 00000000 c11c7ee0 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000001
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0146229>] __get_page_state+0x29/0x90
> Feb 13 20:37:41 mesh kernel: [<c0147320>] wb_kupdate+0x0/0x120
That is a statically stored timer. It would appear that some other timer
from some other random part of the kernel has got itself scribbled on.
Maybe networking?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-13 21:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-13 20:56 2.5.60-bk pdflush oops Dave Jones
2003-02-13 21:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-13 21:33 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-13 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-13 21:31 ` Dave Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox