From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction.
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 21:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030309203144.GA3814@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030309195555.A22226@infradead.org>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:55:55PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:33:59PM -0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> > There still seems to be some users of that, so I'll
> > leave that to a follow up patch, (or someone else who
> > really knows whats going on there).
>
> No, there are no users yet. But as people seem to be eager to make
> dev_t bigger we'll need when we tackle the "CIDR" thing for character
> devices, too.
No, I already wrote "CIDR" for character devices.
(Will submit it when 2.5.65 appears.)
There is no use for i_cdev or struct char_device today,
and I will not use it for character device registration.
So unless you or someone else decides to start using it,
it can just be thrown out.
Andries
[I already submitted the patch throwing it out, but someone,
maybe it was Roman Zippel, complained that that was going
in the wrong direction. In the very long run that may be true
(or not), but for 2.6 I do not see the point of this dead code.]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-09 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-09 13:54 Fwd: struct inode size reduction Dave Jones
2003-03-09 17:13 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-09 20:33 ` Dave Jones
2003-03-09 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-09 20:31 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2003-03-09 22:18 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-09 23:08 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-10 2:23 ` Alexander Viro
2003-03-10 10:58 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-10 12:05 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-10 16:25 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-10 17:32 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-10 18:39 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-09 22:45 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-03-10 0:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-03-09 23:59 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-03-10 5:04 ` Miles Bader
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-10 9:30 Fwd: " Andries.Brouwer
2003-03-10 9:32 Andries.Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030309203144.GA3814@win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox