public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Boot failure, VIA chipset.
@ 2003-04-30 16:11 Daniel Taylor
  2003-04-30 21:48 ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Taylor @ 2003-04-30 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I have a KT400-based system that will not boot the 2.5 series kernels.

It fails with a hard lock immediately after the video mode query when
VGA=ask is set in /etc/lilo.conf.

If anyone else is working on this contact me, otherwise I'll post
my results when I get it working.

-- 
Daniel Taylor        VP Operations and Development   Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor@vocalabs.com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        (952)941-6580x203


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Boot failure, VIA chipset.
       [not found] <20030430171909.GA9529@localhost.localdomain>
@ 2003-04-30 16:31 ` Daniel Taylor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Taylor @ 2003-04-30 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Balram Adlakha; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Balram Adlakha wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 11:11:54AM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote:
> > I have a KT400-based system that will not boot the 2.5 series kernels.
> >
> > It fails with a hard lock immediately after the video mode query when
> > VGA=ask is set in /etc/lilo.conf.
> >
> > If anyone else is working on this contact me, otherwise I'll post
> > my results when I get it working.
> >
>
> And what happens when VGA=ask is not set? What happens when its disabled in the config?
>
It fails silently after unpacking the kernel.

Sorry, I was insufficiently clear on that.

So far I have tried:
  Disabling all module functions
  Disabling APIC
  Recompiling for 386 rather than K7
  Disabling all special video options (Framebuf,  video mode select)

I have yet to try a completely minimal 386 config, that is my next step,
then I start putting printk()'s in to localise the hang more effectively.

-- 
Daniel Taylor        VP Operations and Development   Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor@vocalabs.com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        (952)941-6580x203


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Boot failure, VIA chipset.
  2003-04-30 16:11 Boot failure, VIA chipset Daniel Taylor
@ 2003-04-30 21:48 ` Dave Jones
  2003-05-01  9:53   ` Daniel Taylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2003-04-30 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Taylor; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 11:11:54AM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote:
 > I have a KT400-based system that will not boot the 2.5 series kernels.
 > 
 > It fails with a hard lock immediately after the video mode query when
 > VGA=ask is set in /etc/lilo.conf.
 > 
 > If anyone else is working on this contact me, otherwise I'll post
 > my results when I get it working.

make sure you enabled

CONFIG_INPUT=y
CONFIG_VT=y
CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y

		Dave

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Boot failure, VIA chipset.
  2003-04-30 21:48 ` Dave Jones
@ 2003-05-01  9:53   ` Daniel Taylor
  2003-05-01 15:32     ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Taylor @ 2003-05-01  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 11:11:54AM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote:
>  > I have a KT400-based system that will not boot the 2.5 series kernels.
>  >
>  > It fails with a hard lock immediately after the video mode query when
>  > VGA=ask is set in /etc/lilo.conf.
>  >
>  > If anyone else is working on this contact me, otherwise I'll post
>  > my results when I get it working.
>
> make sure you enabled
>
> CONFIG_INPUT=y
> CONFIG_VT=y
> CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
>
All enabled, and I tried last night with a stripped down 386 only kernel.

No dice, dies hard even before printing the Kernel ID.

It is probably a BIOS compatability issue, but it works OK with 2.4. Since
the system actually works as it sits I've been taking my time debugging
the 2.5 issues.

-- 
Daniel Taylor        VP Operations and Development   Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor@vocalabs.com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        (952)941-6580x203


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Boot failure, VIA chipset.
  2003-05-01 15:32     ` Dave Jones
@ 2003-05-01 10:41       ` Daniel Taylor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Taylor @ 2003-05-01 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Thu, 1 May 2003, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 05:53:53AM -0400, Daniel Taylor wrote:
>  > > CONFIG_INPUT=y
>  > > CONFIG_VT=y
>  > > CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
>  > >
>  > All enabled, and I tried last night with a stripped down 386 only kernel.
>  >
>  > No dice, dies hard even before printing the Kernel ID.
>  >
>  > It is probably a BIOS compatability issue, but it works OK with 2.4. Since
>  > the system actually works as it sits I've been taking my time debugging
>  > the 2.5 issues.
>
> The only other outstanding hang that I've seen was caused by ACPI.
> Does it boot with acpi=off ?
>
That was the _first_ thing I tried. I've got it stripped down almost
to driverless (I still have IDE and filesystems compiled in). No advanced
options selected at all as far as I can find.

-- 
Daniel Taylor        VP Operations and Development   Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor@vocalabs.com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        (952)941-6580x203


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Boot failure, VIA chipset.
  2003-05-01  9:53   ` Daniel Taylor
@ 2003-05-01 15:32     ` Dave Jones
  2003-05-01 10:41       ` Daniel Taylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2003-05-01 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Taylor; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 05:53:53AM -0400, Daniel Taylor wrote:
 > > CONFIG_INPUT=y
 > > CONFIG_VT=y
 > > CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
 > >
 > All enabled, and I tried last night with a stripped down 386 only kernel.
 > 
 > No dice, dies hard even before printing the Kernel ID.
 > 
 > It is probably a BIOS compatability issue, but it works OK with 2.4. Since
 > the system actually works as it sits I've been taking my time debugging
 > the 2.5 issues.

The only other outstanding hang that I've seen was caused by ACPI.
Does it boot with acpi=off ?

		Dave


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-01 15:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-30 16:11 Boot failure, VIA chipset Daniel Taylor
2003-04-30 21:48 ` Dave Jones
2003-05-01  9:53   ` Daniel Taylor
2003-05-01 15:32     ` Dave Jones
2003-05-01 10:41       ` Daniel Taylor
     [not found] <20030430171909.GA9529@localhost.localdomain>
2003-04-30 16:31 ` Daniel Taylor

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox