Where'd my second proc go?

Where'd my second proc go?

[Robert L. Harris]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --]



Dual-P3-850.  Bios reports both procs.  2.4.21-ac3 reported both procs.
2.4.22-rc2-ac1 only shows one.  The lilo used to have a "maxcpus=1"
append but I removed that and I tried changing it to 4 even.  cat
/proc/cpu only shows 1 still.


root# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 8
model name      : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping        : 3
cpu MHz         : 846.342
cache size      : 256 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips        : 1684.27

root# uname -a
Linux nms-hub2.acs.pnap.net 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 #1 SMP Sat Aug 9 12:32:27 EDT 2003 i686 unknown


Pushing to the latest 2.4.22 kernel would be a nightmare as that means
another testing cycle and 2.4.23 will be out before it gets passed.

Thoughts?
  Robert



:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
  Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
    Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:

> 
> 
> Dual-P3-850.  Bios reports both procs.  2.4.21-ac3 reported both procs.
> 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 only shows one.  The lilo used to have a "maxcpus=1"
> append but I removed that and I tried changing it to 4 even.  cat
> /proc/cpu only shows 1 still.

dmesg?

> root# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> cpu family      : 6
> model           : 8
> model name      : Pentium III (Coppermine)
> stepping        : 3
> cpu MHz         : 846.342
> cache size      : 256 KB
> physical id     : 0
> siblings        : 1
> fdiv_bug        : no
> hlt_bug         : no
> f00f_bug        : no
> coma_bug        : no
> fpu             : yes
> fpu_exception   : yes
> cpuid level     : 2
> wp              : yes
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> bogomips        : 1684.27
> 
> root# uname -a
> Linux nms-hub2.acs.pnap.net 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 #1 SMP Sat Aug 9 12:32:27 EDT 2003 i686 unknown
> 
> 
> Pushing to the latest 2.4.22 kernel would be a nightmare as that means
> another testing cycle and 2.4.23 will be out before it gets passed.
> 
> Thoughts?
>   Robert
> 
> 
> 
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
>                                          @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> DISCLAIMER:
>       These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.
> 
> Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
>   Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
>     Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.
> 

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Robert L. Harris]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5528 bytes --]

Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):

> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Dual-P3-850.  Bios reports both procs.  2.4.21-ac3 reported both procs.
> > 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 only shows one.  The lilo used to have a "maxcpus=1"
> > append but I removed that and I tried changing it to 4 even.  cat
> > /proc/cpu only shows 1 still.
> 
> dmesg?
> 
> > root# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
> > processor       : 0
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 8
> > model name      : Pentium III (Coppermine)
> > stepping        : 3
> > cpu MHz         : 846.342
> > cache size      : 256 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 1
> > fdiv_bug        : no
> > hlt_bug         : no
> > f00f_bug        : no
> > coma_bug        : no
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 2
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > bogomips        : 1684.27
> > 
> > root# uname -a
> > Linux nms-hub2.acs.pnap.net 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 #1 SMP Sat Aug 9 12:32:27 EDT 2003 i686 unknown
> > 
> > 
> > Pushing to the latest 2.4.22 kernel would be a nightmare as that means
> > another testing cycle and 2.4.23 will be out before it gets passed.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> >   Robert


Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=linux ro root=801 console=tty0
console=ttyS0 maxcpus=4
Initializing CPU#0
Detected 846.342 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
Calibrating delay loop... 1684.27 BogoMIPS
Memory: 252844k/262080k available (3557k kernel code, 8848k reserved,
1109k data, 620k init, 0k highmem)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Inode cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Buffer cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Page-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
CPU serial number disabled.
CPU:     After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
CPU:     After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 03
per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 731.27 usecs.
task migration cache decay timeout: 10 msecs.
enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Error: only one processor found.
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
Setting 0 in the phys_id_present_map
...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 0 ... ok.
init IO_APIC IRQs
 IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 0-0, 0-9, 0-10, 0-11, 0-16, 0-17, 0-18, 0-20,
0-22, 0-23 not connected.
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
number of MP IRQ sources: 17.
number of IO-APIC #0 registers: 24.
testing the IO APIC.......................

IO APIC #0......
.... register #00: 00000000
.......    : physical APIC id: 00
.
.
.
IRQ21 -> 0:21
.................................... done.
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
calibrating APIC timer ...
..... CPU clock speed is 846.3425 MHz.
..... host bus clock speed is 99.5696 MHz.
cpu: 0, clocks: 995696, slice: 497848
CPU0<T0:995696,T1:497840,D:8,S:497848,C:995696>
migration_task 0 on cpu=0
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfdab0, last bus=2
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
PCI: Discovered primary peer bus ff [IRQ]
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/7110] at 00:12.0
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I12,P0) -> 19
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I12,P0) -> 19
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I14,P0) -> 21
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I18,P3) -> 21
isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards...
isapnp: No Plug & Play device found
PnPBIOS: Found PnP BIOS installation structure at 0xc00f6c60
PnPBIOS: PnP BIOS version 1.0, entry 0xf0000:0xa8cb, dseg 0x400
PnPBIOS: 19 nodes reported by PnP BIOS; 19 recorded by driver
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0xc00-0xc3f has been reserved
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0xca0-0xca3 has been reserved
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0xcb8-0xcbf has been reserved
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0x1000-0x103f has been reserved
PnPBIOS: PNP0c02: ioport range 0x1040-0x104f has been reserved
Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
Initializing RT netlink socket
BIOS EDD facility v0.09 2003-Jan-22, 1 devices found
Starting kswapd
Journalled Block Device driver loaded


:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
  Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
    Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:

> Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):
> 
> > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dual-P3-850.  Bios reports both procs.  2.4.21-ac3 reported both procs.
> > > 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 only shows one.  The lilo used to have a "maxcpus=1"
> > > append but I removed that and I tried changing it to 4 even.  cat
> > > /proc/cpu only shows 1 still.
> > 
> > dmesg?

It looks strange, can you boot with 'debug' kernel parameter and send the 
entire /var/log/dmesg

Thanks

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Robert L. Harris]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]


Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):

> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> 
> > Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):
> > 
> > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Dual-P3-850.  Bios reports both procs.  2.4.21-ac3 reported both procs.
> > > > 2.4.22-rc2-ac1 only shows one.  The lilo used to have a "maxcpus=1"
> > > > append but I removed that and I tried changing it to 4 even.  cat
> > > > /proc/cpu only shows 1 still.
> > > 
> > > dmesg?
> 
> It looks strange, can you boot with 'debug' kernel parameter and send the 
> entire /var/log/dmesg
> 
> Thanks

I'll try and get a window, this is a production box so I can't keep
rebooting it.  just put 'append="debug"' in the lilo.conf and reboot?
(headless server)

Robert

:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
  Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
    Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:

> I'll try and get a window, this is a production box so I can't keep
> rebooting it.  just put 'append="debug"' in the lilo.conf and reboot?
> (headless server)

Yep, the other dmesg had missing parts..

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Robert L. Harris]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 794 bytes --]


Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):

> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> 
> > I'll try and get a window, this is a production box so I can't keep
> > rebooting it.  just put 'append="debug"' in the lilo.conf and reboot?
> > (headless server)
> 
> Yep, the other dmesg had missing parts..

Attaching it gzip'd.


:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
  Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
    Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.

[-- Attachment #1.2: dmesg.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 8865 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Where'd my second proc go?

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 570 bytes --]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:

> 
> Thus spake Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca):
> 
> > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll try and get a window, this is a production box so I can't keep
> > > rebooting it.  just put 'append="debug"' in the lilo.conf and reboot?
> > > (headless server)
> > 
> > Yep, the other dmesg had missing parts..
> 
> Attaching it gzip'd.

Hmm could you try running the attached and sending the output, that might 
help if not, i'll need you to send over a dmesg from a working kernel.

Thanks,
	Zwane

[-- Attachment #2: Type: APPLICATION/X-GZIP, Size: 8344 bytes --]