Re: Wacom USB driver patch

[Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:23:11 -0800
Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com> wrote:

>  <<linuxwacom.patch>> 

This looks much better, it's not line-wrapped.

I have one question though, about this part:

@@ -152,15 +150,103 @@ static void wacom_pl_irq(struct urb *urb

+                       /* was entered with stylus2 pressed */
+                       if (wacom->tool[1] == BTN_TOOL_RUBBER && !(data[4] & 0x20) ) {
+                               /* report out proximity for previous tool */
+                               input_report_key(dev, wacom->tool[1], 0);
+                               input_sync(dev);
+                               wacom->tool[1] = BTN_TOOL_PEN;
+                               return;
+                       }

Is it safe to just return without resubmitting the urb here?

@@ -231,8 +317,12 @@ static void wacom_graphire_irq(struct ur
+       /* check if we can handle the data */
+       if (data[0] == 99)
+               return;
+
        if (data[0] != 2)

Same here.

Also, please add the path to the patch, e.g. always use recursive diff.

-- Pete