public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: pingc@wacom.com
Cc: vojtech@suse.cz, zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wacom USB driver patch
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:29:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040317092959.5e00fab4.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0402262354190.1653@logos.cnet>

Dear Ping,

Vojtech posted your 2.6 patch to linux-kernel yesterday, so I examined it
(Subject: [PATCH 32/44] Update of Wacom driver from Ping Cheng (from Wacom)).
Unlike the 2.4 version, it does not feature a reset thread. Please tell
me why that thread was required in 2.4.

Or perhaps it was present in your original submission which I lost and
Vojtech removed that element of the patch?

Yours truly,
-- Pete

> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:29:04 -0800
> From: Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com>
> To: 'Vojtech Pavlik ' <vojtech@suse.cz>, 'Pete Zaitcev ' <zaitcev@redhat.com>
> Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org '" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: RE: Wacom USB driver patch
> 
>  <<wacom_2.4.patch>>
> The attached patch is against the latest versions of wacom.c and hid-core.c
> at  http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4.
> 
> Ping
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vojtech Pavlik
> To: Pete Zaitcev
> Cc: Ping Cheng; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: 2/13/04 12:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Wacom USB driver patch
> 
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:28:09PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:47 -0800
> > Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The wacom.c at http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4 is way out of date and
> > > people are still working on/using 2.4 releases. Should I make a patch for
> > > 2.4?
> >
> > We plan to support 2.4 based releases for several years yet. If Vojtech
> > approves what you did for 2.6, I am all for a backport to Marcelo tree.
> > Marcelo is not very forthcoming with approvals these days, but perhaps
> > it may be folded into some update. But as usual I would like to avoid
> > carrying a patch in Red Hat tree, if at all possible.
> 
> Agreed. Same for us at SUSE.
> 
> -- 
> Vojtech Pavlik
> SuSE Labs, SuSE CR

       reply	other threads:[~2004-03-17 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0402262354190.1653@logos.cnet>
2004-03-17 17:29 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2004-03-17 20:36   ` Wacom USB driver patch Vojtech Pavlik
2004-03-17 22:24 Ping Cheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-20 22:29 Ping Cheng
2004-02-13  0:55 Ping Cheng
2004-02-13  3:28 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-02-13  8:13   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-02-11 19:47 Ping Cheng
2004-02-11 20:04 ` Vojtech Pavlik
     [not found] <mailman.1076463721.27289.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2004-02-11 19:04 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-02-11  1:23 Ping Cheng
2004-02-11  8:24 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-03-08  9:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040317092959.5e00fab4.zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pingc@wacom.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox