From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org,
pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:16:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403091016.30844.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404CF07D.1090303@mvista.com>
On Tuesday 09 Mar 2004 3:45 am, George Anzinger wrote:
> Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > On Monday 08 Mar 2004 3:56 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>"Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com> wrote:
> >>>Here are features that are present only in full kgdb:
> >>> 1. Thread support (aka info threads)
> >>
> >>argh, disaster. I discussed this with Tom a week or so ago when it
> >> looked like this it was being chopped out and I recall being told that
> >> the discussion was referring to something else.
> >>
> >>Ho-hum, sorry. Can we please put this back in?
> >
> > Err., well this is one of the particularly dirty parts of kgdb. That's
> > why it's been kept away. It takes care of correct thread backtraces in
> > some rare cases.
> >
> > If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that the
> > dirty part is kept away and info threads almost always works.
>
> Amit,
>
> I think we should just put the info threads in the core. No attempt to do
> any trace back from kgdb. Let them all show up in the switch code. I have
> a script (gdb macro) that will give a rather decent "info threads" display.
> Oh, we need to add one other responce to kgdb for the process info gdb
> command.
qfProcessInfo looks like a very useful command.
This is still a hack. These kinds of hacks are difficult to maintain over a
long time because they are based on undocumented information.
While setting up kgdb for the first time isn't easy, macros add to that
complexity.
Have you experienced "shakyness" of macros? I have used process information
macros at kgdb.sourceforge.net to display a "ps" command like output since
the days of 2.4.0. I had to change them 3-4 times till now because of kernel
structure changes. The "changing" part is typically a 2-3 hour regorous
exercise :-)
-Amit
> * This query allows the target stub to return an arbitrary string
> * (or strings) giving arbitrary information about the target process.
> * This is optional; the target stub isn't required to implement it.
> *
> * Syntax: qfProcessInfo request first string
> * qsProcessInfo request subsequent string
> * reply: 'O'<hex-encoded-string>
> * 'l' last reply (empty)
> */
> What we want here is the thread name.
>
> Here is the macro set:
>
> set var $low_sched=0
>
> define do_threads
> if (void)$low_sched==(void)0
> set_b
> end
> thread apply all do_th_lines
> end
>
> define do_th_lines
> set var $do_th_co=0
> while ($pc > $low_sched) && ($pc < $high_sched)
> up-silent
> set var $do_th_co=$do_th_co+1
> end
> if $do_th_co==0
> info remote-process
> bt
> else
> up-silent
> info remote-process
> down
> end
> end
>
> define set_b
> set var $low_sched=scheduling_functions_start_here
> set var $high_sched=scheduling_functions_end_here
> end
>
>
> ~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-08 9:39 kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 9:54 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 10:15 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 10:49 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 11:20 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:44 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:54 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 12:00 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 15:19 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 22:26 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 8:58 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 22:19 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 5:08 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 15:37 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 11:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 22:21 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-08 15:22 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 16:32 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 22:29 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-08 22:15 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 4:46 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-03-09 9:29 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 9:32 ` i386-lite [patch 2/3] [Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]] Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 15:06 ` kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Tom Rini
2004-03-10 4:05 ` Amit S. Kale
[not found] <1xpyM-2Op-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xqXN-44F-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xr7w-4c4-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xrqW-4rh-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xuS8-83Q-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-08 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-08 17:18 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-09 4:29 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 4:36 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-10 12:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-10 15:27 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-11 4:57 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-11 5:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-11 5:11 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403091016.30844.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox