* 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS @ 2004-03-28 0:56 Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 2:09 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kernel The last two iterations of -mm kernels have caused my FPS count via glxgears to drop from about 2000 fps to about 180 fps. I rebuilt X11 to see if that would help but it did not. This is with a Radeon 9100 AGP card and an Intel 865PE based motherboard. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 0:56 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 2:09 ` Andrew Morton 2004-03-28 3:16 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-03-28 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Johnson; +Cc: linux-kernel Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> wrote: > > The last two iterations of -mm kernels have caused my FPS count via > glxgears to drop from about 2000 fps to about 180 fps. I rebuilt X11 to > see if that would help but it did not. > > This is with a Radeon 9100 AGP card and an Intel 865PE based > motherboard. It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of bk-agpgart.patch and retest? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 2:09 ` Andrew Morton @ 2004-03-28 3:16 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Kernel On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 20:09, Andrew Morton wrote: > Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> wrote: > > > > The last two iterations of -mm kernels have caused my FPS count via > > glxgears to drop from about 2000 fps to about 180 fps. I rebuilt X11 to > > see if that would help but it did not. > > > > This is with a Radeon 9100 AGP card and an Intel 865PE based > > motherboard. > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 3:16 ` Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2004-03-28 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Johnson; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Kernel * Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> wrote: > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? > > I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I > am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. what does 'glxinfo | grep rendering' show? Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 16:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen 2004-03-28 16:53 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Kernel On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 03:06, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> wrote: > > > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > > > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? > > > > I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I > > am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. > > what does 'glxinfo | grep rendering' show? It shows: direct rendering: Yes I had checked that first thing. I also verified that the AGPgart detected the chipset, etc. Everything seems okay in the XFree86 log file as well. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 16:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen 2004-03-28 17:01 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 16:53 ` Glenn Johnson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2004-03-28 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Glenn Johnson, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton On Sunday 28 March 2004 18:17, Glenn Johnson wrote: Hi Glenn, > > > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > > > > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? > > > I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I > > > am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. > > what does 'glxinfo | grep rendering' show? what about reverting "DRM-cvs-update.patch"? ciao, Marc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 16:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2004-03-28 17:01 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc-Christian Petersen; +Cc: Kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 10:30, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > On Sunday 28 March 2004 18:17, Glenn Johnson wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > > > > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > > > > > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? > > > > I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I > > > > am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. > > > what does 'glxinfo | grep rendering' show? > > what about reverting "DRM-cvs-update.patch"? I have not tried that but has that patch been in the tree for some time now? My DRI works fine with 2.6.5-rc2-mm2, which has that patch. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 16:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2004-03-28 16:53 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 19:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kernel On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 10:17, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 03:06, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> wrote: > > > > > > It could be the AGP changes. Please do a `patch -p1 -R' of > > > > bk-agpgart.patch and retest? > > > > > > I reverted that patch and retested but it did not solve the problem. I > > > am still only seeing about 180 fps with glxgears. > > > > what does 'glxinfo | grep rendering' show? > > It shows: > > direct rendering: Yes > > I had checked that first thing. I also verified that the AGPgart > detected the chipset, etc. Everything seems okay in the XFree86 log file > as well. I just did a diff of my XFree86 log files with the system booted using the 2.6.5-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.5-rc2-mm4 kernels, respectively. Here is the diff, so maybe this will mean something. --- XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm2.log 2004-03-28 10:32:00.070254034 -0600 +++ XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm4.log 2004-03-28 10:29:30.123163884 -0600 @@ -19 +19 @@ -(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:31:22 2004 +(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:28:32 2004 @@ -713,2 +713,2 @@ -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe188b000 -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe188b000 to 0x48328000 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe1889000 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe1889000 to 0x48328000 @@ -764 +764 @@ -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 169 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 10 -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 16:53 ` Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 19:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo 2004-03-28 22:48 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2004-03-28 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Johnson; +Cc: Kernel On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Glenn Johnson wrote: > I just did a diff of my XFree86 log files with the system booted using > the 2.6.5-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.5-rc2-mm4 kernels, respectively. Here is the > diff, so maybe this will mean something. > > --- XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm2.log 2004-03-28 10:32:00.070254034 -0600 > +++ XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm4.log 2004-03-28 10:29:30.123163884 -0600 > @@ -19 +19 @@ > -(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:31:22 2004 > +(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:28:32 2004 > @@ -713,2 +713,2 @@ > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe188b000 > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe188b000 to 0x48328000 > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe1889000 > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe1889000 to 0x48328000 That's just a memory allocation, so that will never be consistent. > @@ -764 +764 @@ > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 169 > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 10 You're not using CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR in the newer kernel, but that also wouldn't make a difference. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS 2004-03-28 19:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2004-03-28 22:48 ` Glenn Johnson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Glenn Johnson @ 2004-03-28 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zwane Mwaikambo; +Cc: Kernel On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 13:35, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Glenn Johnson wrote: > > > I just did a diff of my XFree86 log files with the system booted using > > the 2.6.5-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.5-rc2-mm4 kernels, respectively. Here is the > > diff, so maybe this will mean something. > > > > --- XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm2.log 2004-03-28 10:32:00.070254034 -0600 > > +++ XFree86-2.6.5-rc2-mm4.log 2004-03-28 10:29:30.123163884 -0600 > > @@ -19 +19 @@ > > -(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:31:22 2004 > > +(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Mar 28 10:28:32 2004 > > @@ -713,2 +713,2 @@ > > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe188b000 > > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe188b000 to 0x48328000 > > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe1889000 > > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe1889000 to 0x48328000 > > That's just a memory allocation, so that will never be consistent. > > > @@ -764 +764 @@ > > -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 169 > > +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 10 > > You're not using CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR in the newer kernel, but that also > wouldn't make a difference. Actually, I am using CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR in both. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-28 22:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-03-28 0:56 2.6.5-rc2-mm[34] causes drop in DRI FPS Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 2:09 ` Andrew Morton 2004-03-28 3:16 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 16:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen 2004-03-28 17:01 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 16:53 ` Glenn Johnson 2004-03-28 19:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo 2004-03-28 22:48 ` Glenn Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox