From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>,
"Walker, Bruce J" <bruce.walker@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Discussion of clustering software components including GFS
<linux-cluster@redhat.com>,
dcl_discussion@osdl.org, cgl_discussion@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:57:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040812095736.GE4096@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092249962.4717.21.camel@persist.az.mvista.com>
On 2004-08-11T11:46:03,
Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> said:
> If we can't live with the cluster services in userland (although I'm
> still not convinced), then atleast the group messaging protocol in the
> kernel could be based upon 20 years of research in group messaging and
> work properly under _all_ fault scenarios.
Right. Another important alternative maybe the Transis group
communication suite, which has been released as GPL/LGPL now.
This all just highlights that we need to think about communication some
more before we can tackle it sensibly, but of course I'll be glad if
someone proves me wrong and Just Does It ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering \ I allow neither my experience
SUSE Labs, Research and Development | nor my cynicism to deter my
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company \ optimistic outlook on life.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3689AF909D816446BA505D21F1461AE4C75110@cacexc04.americas.cpqcorp.net>
2004-08-11 18:46 ` [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials Steven Dake
2004-08-12 9:57 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2004-08-12 17:42 ` Steven Dake
2004-08-12 20:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-12 22:59 ` Steven Dake
2004-08-13 9:40 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-13 15:54 ` Jonathan Stanton
2004-08-13 20:30 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-13 22:53 ` Jonathan Stanton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040812095736.GE4096@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=bruce.walker@hp.com \
--cc=cgl_discussion@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=dcl_discussion@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-cluster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdake@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox