public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Otto Wyss <otto.wyss@orpatec.ch>
Cc: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New concept of ext3 disk checks
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:39:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040812223907.GA7720@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <411BAFCA.92217D16@orpatec.ch>

On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 07:58:33PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> - Instead of checks forced during startup checks are done during runtime
> (at low priority). It has to be determined if these checks are _only_
> checks or if they also include possible fixes. Possible solution might
> distinct between the severity of any discovered problem.

This is something that doesn't require any kernel patches, or any
other C coding for that matter, so it would be a great first project
for someone who wanted to learn how to use the device-mapper snapshot
feature.  Basically, what you do is the following in a shell script
which is fired off by cron once a week at 3am (or some other
appropriate time):

1) Create a clean, read-only snapshot of an ext3 filesystem using
device mapper.

2) Run e2fsck -f on the snapshot, and check to see if there are any
error on the filesystem.  Assuming a non-buggy kernel and properly
functioning hardware, there should be none.  Afterwards, release the
read-only snapshot.

3) If there are any errors, e-mail the output of e2fsck to the system
administrator.

4) If there were no errors detecting by the fsck run, run the command
"tune2fs -C 0 -T now /dev/XXX" on the live filesystem.  This sets the
mount count and last filesystem checked time to the appropriate values
in the superblock.

Tell you what --- if someone is willing to put the time into
developing such a script, I'll include it in the contrib section of
e2fsprogs.  I've put all the hooks to do this in e2fsprogs, and I've
wanted this for quite some time, but the last time I looked at it, the
command-line EVMS tools were truly gruesome to behold/use.  I believe
things have gotten much better since then, so this shouldn't be too
hard to do now.

					- Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-12 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-12 17:58 New concept of ext3 disk checks Otto Wyss
2004-08-12 18:58 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-12 21:07   ` Lee Revell
2004-08-12 19:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-14  7:26   ` Otto Wyss
2004-08-12 22:39 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2004-08-12 23:55   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-13  0:34   ` Andreas Dilger
2004-08-14  7:15     ` Otto Wyss
2004-08-15  0:23       ` Andreas Dilger
     [not found] <2ssbz-jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2swyz-3ny-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-12 23:24   ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-12 23:48     ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040812223907.GA7720@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=otto.wyss@orpatec.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox