public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Otto Wyss <otto.wyss@orpatec.ch>
To: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: New concept of ext3 disk checks
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:58:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <411BAFCA.92217D16@orpatec.ch> (raw)

I've just read about "Increasing ext3 Disk Checks In The Event Of
Improper Shutdown" in Kernel-Traffic. Since in theory journalling file
systems may prevent any disk corruption the disk checks from the ext2
area doesn't make much sense anymore. Also more and more system don't
boot regularly anymore so the time frame between check isn't
predictable. To take into account that the practice not always behaves
as the theory says, I suggest another concept for ext3 disk checks:

- Instead of checks forced during startup checks are done during runtime
(at low priority). It has to be determined if these checks are _only_
checks or if they also include possible fixes. Possible solution might
distinct between the severity of any discovered problem.

The advantage of such a concept are rather obvious, desktop systems
don't have to use ridiculous high check interval values or disable
checks altogether and server systems may run forever. Also checks may be
done first on the written disk sectors. On an average loaded system,
this way malfunctioning software are detected within minutes and
hardware possibly within days, a rather high improvement to the current
detection time of sometimes months.

O. Wyss

-- 
See a huge pile of work at "http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/"

             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-12 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-12 17:58 Otto Wyss [this message]
2004-08-12 18:58 ` New concept of ext3 disk checks Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-12 21:07   ` Lee Revell
2004-08-12 19:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-14  7:26   ` Otto Wyss
2004-08-12 22:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-08-12 23:55   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-13  0:34   ` Andreas Dilger
2004-08-14  7:15     ` Otto Wyss
2004-08-15  0:23       ` Andreas Dilger
     [not found] <2ssbz-jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2swyz-3ny-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-12 23:24   ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-12 23:48     ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=411BAFCA.92217D16@orpatec.ch \
    --to=otto.wyss@orpatec.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox