* [patch 3/8] uml: Fix SKAS sig-handler reentrancy [before 2.6.11]
@ 2005-02-04 18:35 blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: blaisorblade @ 2005-02-04 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel, jdike, user-mode-linux-devel, blaisorblade
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
CC: uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
This adds code which enables SIGSEGV reception to the SKAS sig_handler_common,
which matches the tt code.
I still need to figure out why the SA_NODEFER flag was backed out in favor of this.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/kernel/skas/trap_user.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff -puN arch/um/kernel/skas/trap_user.c~uml-no-defer arch/um/kernel/skas/trap_user.c
--- linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/skas/trap_user.c~uml-no-defer 2005-02-04 06:14:11.966064760 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/kernel/skas/trap_user.c 2005-02-04 06:14:11.969064304 +0100
@@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ void sig_handler_common_skas(int sig, vo
int save_errno = errno;
int save_user;
+ /* This is done because to allow SIGSEGV to be delivered inside a SEGV
+ * handler. This can happen in copy_user, and if SEGV is disabled,
+ * the process will die.
+ * XXX Figure out why this is better than SA_NODEFER
+ */
+ if(sig == SIGSEGV)
+ change_sig(SIGSEGV, 1);
+
r = &TASK_REGS(get_current())->skas;
save_user = r->is_user;
r->is_user = 0;
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-02-04 20:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-04 18:35 [patch 3/8] uml: Fix SKAS sig-handler reentrancy [before 2.6.11] blaisorblade
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox