From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: arjan@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbadari@us.ibm.com,
kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:17:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060121131718.1b6bbcdc.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060121194102.GB28051@redhat.com>
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:52:27AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Let's do the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver in 2.6.17.
> > > >
> > >
> > > heh. I was just thinking that I hadn't heard from Badari and Ken in a while.
> > >
> > > I doubt if this'll fly. We're stuck with it.
> >
> > One thing we can do is ask the distributions to stop shipping raw first,
> > to see what the fallout is (and to give it as a sign that it's an
> > obsolete interface). Then a year or two after that....
>
> It's been off in Fedora since FC4.
> RHEL4 had it enabled after several vendors complained a lot about its
> absense breaking an installed userbase, though they were told it would be
> enabled with the proviso that it would go away in the future.
> RHEL5 isn't even in beta yet, but I can already hear the voices asking
> for it be reenabled..
>
Thanks for trying though ;) It's good that RH is helping to push things
along like this - the easiest path would be to turn the thing on and
complain when anyone made noises about taking it out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-21 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 3:02 [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 3:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 5:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-21 1:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:49 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 16:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-19 16:52 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 16:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 18:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-20 8:24 ` [SARCASM] " Ingo Oeser
2006-01-20 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-22 12:51 ` [OT] " Alexander E. Patrakov
2006-01-21 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 19:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-21 21:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-21 21:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-21 21:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 17:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-21 23:26 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 23:53 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:59 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 0:09 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-22 0:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-22 1:30 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 8:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 20:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-22 21:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060121131718.1b6bbcdc.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox