From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@ums.usu.ru>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [OT] Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:51:59 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D37FEF.9070603@ums.usu.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060119165832.GS19398@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The oflag=direct option was added to GNU coreutils in version 5.3.0.
5.3.0 is "beta", 5.93 is "stable". But there is one thing that won't let
you use newer Coreutils: LSB, namely the Li18nux2000 tests. Coreutils is
one of those packages that never go to distros in their pristine form.
And, alas, there is still no working patch against Coreutils-5.93 that
allows passing the LSB testsuite completely. And distromakers won't
trade bugs tested in LSB for bugs unknown to LSB but fixed upstream. So,
users are really screwed.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-22 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 3:02 [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 3:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 5:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-21 1:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:49 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 16:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-19 16:52 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 16:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 18:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-20 8:24 ` [SARCASM] " Ingo Oeser
2006-01-20 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-22 12:51 ` Alexander E. Patrakov [this message]
2006-01-21 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 19:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-21 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-21 21:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-21 21:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 17:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-21 23:26 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 23:53 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:59 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 0:09 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-22 0:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-22 1:30 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 8:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 20:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-22 21:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D37FEF.9070603@ums.usu.ru \
--to=patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox