Re: [PATCHv2] parport: add parallel port support for SGI O2

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@free.fr> wrote:
>
> From: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@free.fr>
> 
> Add support for the built-in parallel port on SGI O2 (a.k.a. IP32).
> Define a new configuration option: PARPORT_IP32.  The module is named
> parport_ip32.
> 
> Hardware support for SPP, EPP and ECP modes along with DMA support
> when available are currently implemented.

Nice looking driver.  Big.

It does rather a lot of

	if (foo)	do_something();

whereas we prefer

	if (foo)
		do_something();

but if that was a blocker, we wouldn't have any drivers.

> +static void parport_ip32_dma_setup_context(unsigned int limit)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&parport_ip32_dma.lock, flags);
> +	if (parport_ip32_dma.left > 0) {
> +		volatile u64 __iomem *ctxreg = (parport_ip32_dma.ctx == 0) ?
> +			&mace->perif.ctrl.parport.context_a :
> +			&mace->perif.ctrl.parport.context_b;

Does this need to be volatile?   writeq() should do the right thing.

> +static size_t parport_ip32_epp_read(void __iomem *eppreg,
> +				    struct parport *p, void *buf,
> +				    size_t len, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct parport_ip32_private * const priv = p->physport->private_data;
> +	size_t got;
> +	parport_ip32_set_mode(p, ECR_MODE_EPP);
> +	parport_ip32_data_reverse(p);
> +	parport_ip32_write_control(p, DCR_nINIT);
> +	if ((flags & PARPORT_EPP_FAST) && (len > 1)) {
> +		readsb(eppreg, buf, len);

readsb() is a mips thing, and doesn't seem to be documented.  What does it
do, and why does the driver use it (only) here?

> +		writesb(eppreg, buf, len);

> +static unsigned int parport_ip32_fifo_wait_break(struct parport *p,
> +						 unsigned long expire)
> +{
> +	cond_resched();
> +	if (time_after(jiffies, expire)) {
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG PPIP32
> +		       "%s: FIFO write timed out\n", p->name);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +	if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG PPIP32
> +		       "%s: Signal pending\n", p->name);
> +		return 1;
> +	}

This printk could be a bit noisy, if someone hoses a signal stream at a
printing program.