* kernel.suid_dumpable or fs.suid_dumpable?
@ 2006-03-01 17:03 Sergey Vlasov
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sergey Vlasov @ 2006-03-01 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Alan Cox
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 921 bytes --]
Hello!
Apparently the patch to add kernel.suid_dumpable sysctl:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d6e711448137ca3301512cec41a2c2ce852b3d0a
was applied wrongly - the sysctl was added under "fs" instead of "kernel".
So currently it is fs.suid_dumpable instead of kernel.suid_dumpable, but
the docs (Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt) and include/linux/sysctl.h
(KERN_SETUID_DUMPABLE) say that it should be under "kernel".
Which way this should be fixed - should the sysctl definition be moved
from fs_table to kern_table (thus moving it from fs.suid_dumpable to
kernel.suid_dumpable, as docs say), or should docs be fixed to reflect the
current location of sysctl (and include/linux/sysctl would need to be
fixed too)?
I have filed this as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6145 to
make sure it is not forgotten completely.
--
Sergey Vlasov
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-03-01 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-01 17:03 kernel.suid_dumpable or fs.suid_dumpable? Sergey Vlasov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox