From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] change buffer_head.b_size to size_t
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:22:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060302132232.C88229@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301175148.2250b36e.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:51:48PM -0800
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:51:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > + * Historically, a buffer_head was used to map a single block
> > + * within a page, and of course as the unit of I/O through the
> > + * filesystem and block layers. Nowadays the basic I/O unit
> > + * is the bio, and buffer_heads are used for extracting block
> > + * mappings (via a get_block_t call), for tracking state within
> > + * a page (via a page_mapping) and for wrapping bio submission
> > + * for backward compatibility reasons (e.g. submit_bh).
>
> Well kinda. A buffer_head remains the kernel's basic abstraction for a
> "disk block".
Thats what I said (meant to say) with
"buffer_heads are used for extracting block mappings".
I think by "disk block" you mean what I'm thinking of as a
"block mapping" (series of contiguous blocks). I'd think
of a sector_t as a "disk block", but maybe I'm just wierd
that way... a better wordsmith should jump in and update
the comment I guess.
> We cannot replace that with `struct page' (size isn't
> flexible) nor of course with `struct bio'.
Indeed.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-02 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-27 21:20 [PATCH 0/4] map multiple blocks in get_block() and mpage_readpages() Badari Pulavarty
2006-02-27 21:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] change buffer_head.b_size to size_t Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-02 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 2:22 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2006-03-02 2:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 19:54 ` Tim Pepper
2006-02-27 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] pass b_size to ->get_block() Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-02 1:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 17:17 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-02-27 21:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] map multiple blocks for mpage_readpages() Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-02 4:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 16:51 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-02-27 21:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] remove ->get_blocks() support Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-02 1:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] map multiple blocks in get_block() and mpage_readpages() Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 17:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-03 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 21:54 ` Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060302132232.C88229@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox