The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Dave Peterson <dsp@llnl.gov>,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] EDAC: kobject/sysfs fixes
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 02:44:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060303024403.GA27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060302183153.452f93d9.akpm@osdl.org>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:31:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Peterson <dsp@llnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > - After we unregister a kobject, wait for our kobject release method
> >    to call complete().  This causes us to wait until the kobject
> >    reference count reaches 0.  Otherwise, a task accessing the EDAC
> >    sysfs interface can hold the reference count above 0 until after the
> >    EDAC module has been unloaded.  When the reference count finally
> >    drops to 0, this will result in an attempt to call our release
> >    method inside the EDAC module after the module has already been
> >    unloaded.
> 
> That's not really the way to do it.  If you have all the correct
> module_get()s and try_module_get()s and module_put()s in all the right
> places, kenrel/module.c:wait_for_zero_refcount() should do this for you.

Fundamentally, you _can't_ wait for sysfs references to go away when 
doing rmmod.  You can fail with -EBUSY, but waiting is an instant deadlock.
Why?  Because rmmod your_turd </sys/something_from_your_turd is going to
wait for itself to exit if you do that.

      reply	other threads:[~2006-03-03  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-03  1:48 [PATCH 13/15] EDAC: kobject/sysfs fixes Dave Peterson
2006-03-03  2:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03  2:44   ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060303024403.GA27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=dsp@llnl.gov \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox