From: "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: sis96x compiled in by error: delay of one minute at boot
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:59:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060316035916.GA10675@jupiter.solarsys.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zJe6kSDV.1142413307.3312800.khali@localhost>
Hi Jean:
(cc'ed lm-sensors ML)
[user reports waiting ~23 seconds for i2c/hwmon stuff to init in a
monolithic kernel build]
> On 2006-03-15, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> > Wow, that's a huge delay. One alternative would be for i2c slaves to
> > behave more like USB and do the probing asynchronous to driver load;
> > i.e. 'modprobe w83627hf' returns before the chip is actually recognized
> > and attached.
>
* Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> [2006-03-15 10:01:47 +0100]:
> You mean that the i2c subsystem would finally be rewritten from scratch
> to comply with the driver model? I'm waiting for your patches :)
Heh, 'spose I asked for that.
> > OTOH, that brings up all the related problems. E.g., you could no longer
> > expect this simple fragment of a RC script to work...
> >
> > modprobe i2c-sis96x
> > modprobe asb100
> > sensors -s
>
> I guess we would have to use hotplug instead then.
>
> > Short of fixing all that... one has to accept that (1) i2c bus probing
> > is slow, and (2) some i2c busses themselves are not reliably
> > detectable...
>
> Things can be improved still. The busses which cannot be reliably
> detected could test themselves, and discard themselves if they find they
> don't work. This is much the spirit of the bit_test parameter of the
> i2c-algo-bit module; it could be made the default. i2c-algo-pca could be
> added a similar option.
>
> Also, the i2c subsystem is currently relying on general probing for
> almost everything. Whenever you load an i2c chip driver, it'll probe
> all the i2c busses for supported chips. We tried to limit the probing
> area by introducing the concept of "classes", and we now only probe
> the busses which share a class with the i2c chip driver. Not all drivers
> have been modified to take benefit of that class check though, and the
> i2c core doesn't enforce it at the moment; it is all based on drivers
> cooperation. So there is room for improvement here.
>
> Last, sometimes you know exactly where the chip is, yet the i2c core
> doesn't offer a way to skip the probing step and attach the driver
> directly to the device. I'm working on a way to do that, and hope to
> have something ready to show soon. This should speed up the driver load
> quite a bit.
Here's a start: why does i2c-parport[-light] have a default adapter type?
Loading it with the default could be considered an accident by definition.
It takes ~6 seconds to load all of kernel/drivers/hwmon/*.ko on a test box
here with i2c-parport-light present (but without any adapter hardware).
With this patch, that drops to ~1 second.
---
This patch forces the user to specify what type of adapter is present when
loading i2c-parport or i2c-parport-light. If none is specified, the driver
init simply fails - instead of assuming adapter type 0.
This alleviates the sometimes lengthy boot time delays which can be caused
by accidentally building one of these into a kernel along with several i2c
slave drivers that have lengthy probe routines (e.g. hwmon drivers).
Signed-off-by: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport-light.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport-light.c
@@ -121,9 +121,14 @@ static struct i2c_adapter parport_adapte
static int __init i2c_parport_init(void)
{
- if (type < 0 || type >= ARRAY_SIZE(adapter_parm)) {
+ if (type < 0) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "i2c-parport: adapter type unspecified\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(adapter_parm)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "i2c-parport: invalid type (%d)\n", type);
- type = 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
if (base == 0) {
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport.h
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static struct adapter_parm adapter_parm[
},
};
-static int type;
+static int type = -1;
module_param(type, int, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(type,
"Type of adapter:\n"
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-parport.c
@@ -241,9 +241,14 @@ static struct parport_driver i2c_parport
static int __init i2c_parport_init(void)
{
- if (type < 0 || type >= ARRAY_SIZE(adapter_parm)) {
+ if (type < 0) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "i2c-parport: adapter type unspecified\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(adapter_parm)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "i2c-parport: invalid type (%d)\n", type);
- type = 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
return parport_register_driver(&i2c_parport_driver);
--
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-16 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 10:27 sis96x compiled in by error: delay of one minute at boot Etienne Lorrain
2006-03-13 11:46 ` Jean Delvare
2006-03-13 22:38 ` Etienne Lorrain
2006-03-14 9:43 ` Jean Delvare
2006-03-15 3:46 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-15 9:01 ` Jean Delvare
2006-03-16 3:59 ` Mark M. Hoffman [this message]
2006-03-16 8:46 ` Jean Delvare
2006-03-16 10:53 ` Etienne Lorrain
2006-03-17 4:20 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-20 23:00 ` Etienne Lorrain
2006-03-29 3:45 ` I2C_PCA_ISA causes boot delays (was re: sis96x compiled in by error: delay of one minute at boot) Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-29 9:26 ` Etienne Lorrain
2006-03-29 13:38 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-29 14:00 ` Ian Campbell
2006-03-17 3:56 ` [lm-sensors] sis96x compiled in by error: delay of one minute at boot Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-17 3:58 ` [PATCH 2.6.16-rc6] i2c: require type parameter for i2c-parport and i2c-parport-light Mark M. Hoffman
2006-03-22 12:32 ` Jean Delvare
2006-03-15 23:03 ` [ot] VIA southbridge strangeness (was: sis96x compiled in by error: delay of one minute at boot) Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-16 8:22 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060316035916.GA10675@jupiter.solarsys.private \
--to=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox