Re: [PATCH] ktime/hrtimer: fix kernel-doc comments

["Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:30:57 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 14:20 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > Seriously, is it hard to fix ? I'm not good with perl, so its likely
> > > that I would make more mess than fixups.
> > 
> > I don't know for sure.  I have looked at it a bit and
> > it's messy code IMHO.  Might be easier/better just to rewrite
> > the function (comment) header parsing.
> 
> I would do that, but I have no idea how to mix python into perl :)

so rewrite scripts/kernel-doc in python.  ;)

> > Andrew also wants the short function description to be able to be
> > more than one line.  That could/should be incorporated at the same time.
> 
> That would be a really nice feature.

It's just a convenience factor.  There is another way to have a
multi-line function description.

> > OTOH, it's a defined doc. language and these files contain errors...
> 
> No objections, but it would be cool if some perl experts would remove
> those restrictions before the patches finally hit mainline.

I plan to work on it, but it's not super high priority.
Someone else can do the same...


This is just one example of many files that have similar kernel-doc
problems.  I wasn't picking on your files.  :)

---
~Randy