From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, rpurdie@rpsys.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2 radeon backlight
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:35:14 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302.123514.35465791.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070302122920.a2967ebf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:29:20 -0800
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:24:03 -0800
> Alex Romosan <romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:32:43 -0800
> > > Alex Romosan <romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > >> the backlight on my thinkpad still (2.6.20 worked fine) doesn't come
> > >> on if i have the radeon backlight enabled. without it, i guess it's
> > >> the ibm acpi modules that controls the backlight and it seems to work
> > >> fine.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Unclear. Are you saying that the backlight comes on OK if you use
> > > the IBM acpi module?
> >
> > yes, if i disable the radeon backlight and use the ibm acpi module,
> > than the backlight works. if i enable the radeon backlight, the screen
> > stays dark and i can't turn it on (i tried using radeontool to control
> > it but nothing happened).
>
> Richard, is this actually a bug, or is it a config error or something like that?
>
> And should we track it as a post-2.6.20 regression?
Why don't we compromise for 2.6.21 by marking the Radeon backlight
stuff EXPERIMENTAL until the cases where IBM ACPI works and the
Radeon backlight stuff does not are worked out?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 16:32 2.6.21-rc2 radeon backlight Alex Romosan
2007-03-02 2:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 17:24 ` Alex Romosan
2007-03-02 20:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 20:35 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-03-02 21:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-03-02 21:22 ` Alex Romosan
2007-03-02 21:40 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 21:41 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " James Simmons
2007-03-02 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 23:40 ` Richard Purdie
2007-03-03 16:23 ` James Simmons
2007-03-02 23:32 ` Richard Purdie
2007-03-03 5:34 ` Alex Romosan
2007-03-03 16:06 ` James Simmons
2007-03-03 16:35 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070302.123514.35465791.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox