public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH 0/3] RFC: using hrtimers for in-kernel timeouts
@ 2007-03-05  0:20 Arnd Bergmann
  2007-03-05  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] introduce schedule_timeout_hr Arnd Bergmann
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2007-03-05  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner

I've played around with the new timer statistics to see which timers might
benefit of being moved from traditional timers to hrtimers.

Since my understanding is that timer_list timers are not really meant to
expire, this seems to include a lot of what comes in through
schedule_timeout, in particular select() and futex wait.

I have no idea if what I was attempting is even the right approach to
start with, but I want to share the patches in case it is ;-).

Maybe someone is interested in running some low-level benchmarks on this
or point out any bugs in the code.

	Arnd <><

--


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-05  0:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-05  0:20 [RFC PATCH 0/3] RFC: using hrtimers for in-kernel timeouts Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-05  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] introduce schedule_timeout_hr Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-05  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] use hrtimer in select and pselect Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-05  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] change schedule_timeout to use hrtimers Arnd Bergmann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox