* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo [not found] <200705150417.l4F4HlvS013354@fire-2.osdl.org> @ 2007-05-15 5:09 ` Andrew Morton 2007-05-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-15 5:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Gleixner, john stultz Cc: linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang On Mon, 14 May 2007 21:17:47 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 > > Summary: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo > Kernel Version: 2.6.21 > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Owner: ak@suse.de > Submitter: dang@gentoo.org > > > Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.20 > Distribution: Gentoo > Hardware Environment: core2duo T7200 (all reporters had this same CPU) > Software Environment: Linux 2.6.21, glibc 2.5 > Problem Description: > > gettimeofday returns 1 - 1000000 in tv_usec, not 0 - 999999 > This does not happen on any of my AMD-based 32 or 64 bit boxes, only on my > core2duo; I have 2 other reports of this problem, all on T7200's > > Steps to reproduce: > > call gettimeofday a lot. Eventually, you'll get 1000000 returned in tv_usec. My > average is ~1 in 1000000 calls. I've attached my test program, with output from > various boxes. One of the other reporters tried the test program too, and got > similar output. .config will be attached too. err, whoops. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 5:09 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet 2007-05-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2007-05-15 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, Andi Kleen Andrew Morton a écrit : > On Mon, 14 May 2007 21:17:47 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 >> >> Summary: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo >> Kernel Version: 2.6.21 >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Owner: ak@suse.de >> Submitter: dang@gentoo.org >> >> >> Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.20 >> Distribution: Gentoo >> Hardware Environment: core2duo T7200 (all reporters had this same CPU) >> Software Environment: Linux 2.6.21, glibc 2.5 >> Problem Description: >> >> gettimeofday returns 1 - 1000000 in tv_usec, not 0 - 999999 >> This does not happen on any of my AMD-based 32 or 64 bit boxes, only on my >> core2duo; I have 2 other reports of this problem, all on T7200's >> >> Steps to reproduce: >> >> call gettimeofday a lot. Eventually, you'll get 1000000 returned in tv_usec. My >> average is ~1 in 1000000 calls. I've attached my test program, with output from >> various boxes. One of the other reporters tried the test program too, and got >> similar output. .config will be attached too. > > err, whoops. I remember I already hit this and corrected it http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7cea3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 Maybe a stable push is necessary ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2007-05-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton 2007-05-15 7:22 ` Andi Kleen 2007-05-19 14:30 ` Bill Davidsen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-15 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, Andi Kleen, stable On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:06:52 +0200 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote: > Andrew Morton a écrit : > > On Mon, 14 May 2007 21:17:47 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 > >> > >> Summary: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo > >> Kernel Version: 2.6.21 > >> Status: NEW > >> Severity: normal > >> Owner: ak@suse.de > >> Submitter: dang@gentoo.org > >> > >> > >> Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.20 > >> Distribution: Gentoo > >> Hardware Environment: core2duo T7200 (all reporters had this same CPU) > >> Software Environment: Linux 2.6.21, glibc 2.5 > >> Problem Description: > >> > >> gettimeofday returns 1 - 1000000 in tv_usec, not 0 - 999999 > >> This does not happen on any of my AMD-based 32 or 64 bit boxes, only on my > >> core2duo; I have 2 other reports of this problem, all on T7200's > >> > >> Steps to reproduce: > >> > >> call gettimeofday a lot. Eventually, you'll get 1000000 returned in tv_usec. My > >> average is ~1 in 1000000 calls. I've attached my test program, with output from > >> various boxes. One of the other reporters tried the test program too, and got > >> similar output. .config will be attached too. > > > > err, whoops. > > I remember I already hit this and corrected it > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7cea3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 Oh, OK. > Maybe a stable push is necessary ? yup. Please always think of -stable when preparing fixes. I'm sure many useful fixes are slipping past simply because those who _are_ looking out for backportable fixes are missing things. Greg, Chris: please consider c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675 for -stable, if it isn't already there. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-15 7:22 ` Andi Kleen 2007-05-15 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet 2007-05-19 14:30 ` Bill Davidsen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-05-15 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Eric Dumazet, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, stable > > > > I remember I already hit this and corrected it > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdi > >ff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7ce > >a3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0 > >b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 > > Oh, OK. > > > Maybe a stable push is necessary ? > > yup. Please always think of -stable when preparing fixes. I'm sure many > useful fixes are slipping past simply because those who _are_ looking out > for backportable fixes are missing things. > > Greg, Chris: please consider c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675 > for -stable, if it isn't already there. The full patch is overkill because 99% of it is an totally unrelated optimization. Only the > -> >= change should be backported -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 7:22 ` Andi Kleen @ 2007-05-15 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet 2007-05-15 14:55 ` Daniel Gryniewicz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2007-05-15 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, stable On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:22:47 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > I remember I already hit this and corrected it > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdi > > >ff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7ce > > >a3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0 > > >b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 > > > > Oh, OK. > > > > > Maybe a stable push is necessary ? > > > > yup. Please always think of -stable when preparing fixes. I'm sure many > > useful fixes are slipping past simply because those who _are_ looking out > > for backportable fixes are missing things. > > > > Greg, Chris: please consider c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675 > > for -stable, if it isn't already there. > > The full patch is overkill because 99% of it is an totally unrelated > optimization. Only the > -> >= change should be backported OK, here is the fix only patch, for linux-2.6.21-stable only, since 2.6.22 is already fixed. [PATCH] x86_64 : Fix vgettimeofday() vgettimeofday() may return some bad timeval values, (tv_usec = 1000000), because of a wrong compare. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> --- arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c +++ arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static __always_inline void do_vgettimeo /* convert to usecs and add to timespec: */ tv->tv_usec += nsec_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC; - while (tv->tv_usec > USEC_PER_SEC) { + while (tv->tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC) { tv->tv_sec += 1; tv->tv_usec -= USEC_PER_SEC; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2007-05-15 14:55 ` Daniel Gryniewicz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Daniel Gryniewicz @ 2007-05-15 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Andi Kleen, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, stable On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:17 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > OK, here is the fix only patch, for linux-2.6.21-stable only, since 2.6.22 is already fixed. > > [PATCH] x86_64 : Fix vgettimeofday() > > vgettimeofday() may return some bad timeval values, (tv_usec = 1000000), because of a wrong compare. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> > > --- arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c > +++ arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static __always_inline void do_vgettimeo > > /* convert to usecs and add to timespec: */ > tv->tv_usec += nsec_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC; > - while (tv->tv_usec > USEC_PER_SEC) { > + while (tv->tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC) { > tv->tv_sec += 1; > tv->tv_usec -= USEC_PER_SEC; > } That fixed it, thanks. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton 2007-05-15 7:22 ` Andi Kleen @ 2007-05-19 14:30 ` Bill Davidsen 2007-05-19 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bill Davidsen @ 2007-05-19 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Eric Dumazet, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, Andi Kleen, stable Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:06:52 +0200 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton a écrit : >>> On Mon, 14 May 2007 21:17:47 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: >>> >>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 >>>> >>>> Summary: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo >>>> Kernel Version: 2.6.21 >>>> Status: NEW >>>> Severity: normal >>>> Owner: ak@suse.de >>>> Submitter: dang@gentoo.org >>>> >>>> >>>> Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.20 >>>> Distribution: Gentoo >>>> Hardware Environment: core2duo T7200 (all reporters had this same CPU) >>>> Software Environment: Linux 2.6.21, glibc 2.5 >>>> Problem Description: >>>> >>>> gettimeofday returns 1 - 1000000 in tv_usec, not 0 - 999999 >>>> This does not happen on any of my AMD-based 32 or 64 bit boxes, only on my >>>> core2duo; I have 2 other reports of this problem, all on T7200's >>>> >>>> Steps to reproduce: >>>> >>>> call gettimeofday a lot. Eventually, you'll get 1000000 returned in tv_usec. My >>>> average is ~1 in 1000000 calls. I've attached my test program, with output from >>>> various boxes. One of the other reporters tried the test program too, and got >>>> similar output. .config will be attached too. >>> err, whoops. >> I remember I already hit this and corrected it >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7cea3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 > > Oh, OK. > >> Maybe a stable push is necessary ? > > yup. Please always think of -stable when preparing fixes. I'm sure many > useful fixes are slipping past simply because those who _are_ looking out > for backportable fixes are missing things. > That makes me feel better, I have been occasionally suggesting fixes posted here as candidates for stable, I was afraid I was being a PITA. I forgot about the "stable" address and have been bugging greg, I'll stop that. > Greg, Chris: please consider c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675 > for -stable, if it isn't already there. -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo 2007-05-19 14:30 ` Bill Davidsen @ 2007-05-19 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2007-05-19 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz, linux-kernel, bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org, dang, Andi Kleen, stable Bill Davidsen a écrit : > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:06:52 +0200 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Andrew Morton a écrit : >>>> On Mon, 14 May 2007 21:17:47 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 >>>>> >>>>> Summary: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on >>>>> core2duo >>>>> Kernel Version: 2.6.21 >>>>> Status: NEW >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> Owner: ak@suse.de >>>>> Submitter: dang@gentoo.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.20 >>>>> Distribution: Gentoo >>>>> Hardware Environment: core2duo T7200 (all reporters had this same CPU) >>>>> Software Environment: Linux 2.6.21, glibc 2.5 >>>>> Problem Description: >>>>> >>>>> gettimeofday returns 1 - 1000000 in tv_usec, not 0 - 999999 This >>>>> does not happen on any of my AMD-based 32 or 64 bit boxes, only on my >>>>> core2duo; I have 2 other reports of this problem, all on T7200's >>>>> >>>>> Steps to reproduce: >>>>> >>>>> call gettimeofday a lot. Eventually, you'll get 1000000 returned >>>>> in tv_usec. My >>>>> average is ~1 in 1000000 calls. I've attached my test program, >>>>> with output from >>>>> various boxes. One of the other reporters tried the test program >>>>> too, and got >>>>> similar output. .config will be attached too. >>>> err, whoops. >>> I remember I already hit this and corrected it >>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c;h=dc32cef961950915fbaa185e36ab802d5f7cea3b;hp=ba330f87067996a17495f7d03466d646c718b52c;hb=c8118c6c07f2edfd697aaa0b93e08c3b65a5a675;hpb=272a3713bb9e302e0455c894c41180a482d2c8a3 >>> >> >> Oh, OK. >> >>> Maybe a stable push is necessary ? >> >> yup. Please always think of -stable when preparing fixes. I'm sure many >> useful fixes are slipping past simply because those who _are_ looking out >> for backportable fixes are missing things. >> > That makes me feel better, I have been occasionally suggesting fixes > posted here as candidates for stable, I was afraid I was being a PITA. I > forgot about the "stable" address and have been bugging greg, I'll stop > that. Well, it seems Andrew concern about 'stable' was not right for this particular patch, since I posted it well before 2.6.21-final, and 2.6.20 was not concerned. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-19 18:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200705150417.l4F4HlvS013354@fire-2.osdl.org>
2007-05-15 5:09 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8479] New: gettimeofday returning 1000000 in tv_usec on core2duo Andrew Morton
2007-05-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-15 7:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-15 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-15 14:55 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-05-19 14:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-19 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox