* [PATCH] SPARC64: Emphasize that sparc64 doesn't support return probes.
@ 2007-07-01 16:49 Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-02 3:37 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-07-01 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/Kconfig b/arch/sparc64/Kconfig
index 89a1b46..6b04c86 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc64/Kconfig
@@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ config KPROBES
execute a callback function. register_kprobe() establishes
a probepoint and specifies the callback. Kprobes is useful
for kernel debugging, non-intrusive instrumentation and testing.
+ (Note that sparc64 does *not* currently support return probes.)
If in doubt, say "N".
endmenu
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SPARC64: Emphasize that sparc64 doesn't support return probes.
2007-07-01 16:49 [PATCH] SPARC64: Emphasize that sparc64 doesn't support return probes Robert P. J. Day
@ 2007-07-02 3:37 ` David Miller
2007-07-02 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-07-02 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rpjday; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:49:58 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
I think it's simply better for me to add kretprobe
support don't you think?
It's on my todo list and I don't want to add this doc blurb
that will very shortly become wrong.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SPARC64: Emphasize that sparc64 doesn't support return probes.
2007-07-02 3:37 ` David Miller
@ 2007-07-02 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-07-02 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:49:58 -0400 (EDT)
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
>
> I think it's simply better for me to add kretprobe
> support don't you think?
>
> It's on my todo list and I don't want to add this doc blurb
> that will very shortly become wrong.
ok, i didn't realize that was coming.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-02 8:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-01 16:49 [PATCH] SPARC64: Emphasize that sparc64 doesn't support return probes Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-02 3:37 ` David Miller
2007-07-02 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox