From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@yahoo.fr>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
oleg@tv-sign.ru, rjw@sisk.pl, roland@redhat.com,
xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: + proc-fix-the-threaded-proc-self.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:10:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071130001029.GA17936@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1hcj4buim.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> > You'll never run out of this sort of problem. Keeping Linux lean and
> > simple would be far better.
>
> Nah. The control group stuff has all kinds of corner cases because it
> is a new and untested API. The namespace work after we get the code
> cleanup up so it is maintainable and we can work with it is usually
> just finding our globals through a pointer instead of from a static
> variable. Hardly a measurable cost on the best day.
yeah - anyone who claims that containers are 'fat' has likely not even
looked at the code. Even maintainance-wise there's very visible positive
effects: we do discover and properly map our "global resource"
dependencies and abstract them. That increases cleanliness of our code
and APIs all around.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-30 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200711262339.lAQNdNrw029057@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20071128014901.4b303954@inria.fr>
2007-11-28 9:41 ` + proc-fix-the-threaded-proc-self.patch added to -mm tree Albert Cahalan
2007-11-28 10:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-28 11:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-28 11:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-28 17:47 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-11-29 21:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-30 0:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-30 7:44 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-12-02 4:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-28 18:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-11-29 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071130001029.GA17936@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acahalan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=guichaz@yahoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox