From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 06:37:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080402133715.GA5327@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080402125819.GO12774@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:58:19PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > Date: Wed, Apr 02, 2008 02:36:39PM +0200
> > >
> > > > Looks good and tests fine as well. I've applied it, on top of the
> > > > hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu() fix.
> > > >
> > > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=436151ad32b4a59e0d36165a7d6312545f126661
> > > >
> >
> > ok, thanks. anyway I don't think the hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu()
> > is needed at this point, since the pos->next pointer is still valid
> > (at least) until the next rcu_read_unlock(). am I wrong?
>
> it isn't, but it's still clearer. so either that or a nice comment, I
> just stuck with what I had already committed.
Given Peter's comment, would you be willing to drop the
hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu()? People tend to read too much into
the "safe" sometimes. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 21:08 kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context) Vegard Nossum
2008-04-01 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-01 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 6:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 10:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 7:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 7:20 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-02 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-02 7:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 10:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:33 ` Fabio Checconi
2008-04-02 11:43 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 12:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 12:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 12:55 ` Fabio Checconi
2008-04-02 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 13:16 ` Fabio Checconi
2008-04-02 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 13:37 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-04-02 13:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 16:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 13:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 13:40 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 11:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-02 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-02 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-02 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-02 11:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:32 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:42 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:53 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 13:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 13:43 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-02 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 12:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-02 16:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 16:15 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-02 16:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-02 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 19:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-02 20:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-03 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-03 19:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-03 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 17:31 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-02 10:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-02 10:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-02 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 10:54 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-02 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-02 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 11:13 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080402133715.GA5327@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox