public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:58:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080522082814.GA4499@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211440207.5733.8.camel@marge.simson.net>

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:10:07AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:34 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> > PostgreSQL ships with a simple database benchmarking tool named pgbench, 
> > in what's labeled the contrib section (in many distributions it's a 
> > separate package from the main server/client ones).  I see there's been 
> > some work done already improving how the PostgreSQL server works under the 
> > new scheduler (the "Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5" thread). 
> > I wanted to provide you a different test case using pgbench that has taken 
> > a sharp dive starting with 2.6.23, and the server improvement changes in 
> > 2.6.25 actually made this problem worse.
> > 
> > I think it will be easy for someone else to replicate my results and I'll 
> > go over the exact procedure below.
> 
> Yup, I can reproduce.  Running the test with 2.6.25.4, everything is
> waking/running on one CPU, leaving my box 75% idle.  Not good.
> 

Can you try with 2.6.26-rc? There is minimal load balancing for group
scheduling till 25, which might explain the lack of scalability.

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-22  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-21 17:34 PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+ Greg Smith
2008-05-22  7:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22  8:28   ` Dhaval Giani [this message]
2008-05-22  9:05     ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 10:34       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 11:25         ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 11:44           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 12:09             ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 12:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 13:16                 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23  7:13                 ` Greg Smith
2008-05-23 10:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 10:10                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-23 10:15                       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 23:18                         ` Greg Smith
2008-05-23 23:46                           ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-24  8:08                             ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27  0:28                             ` Greg Smith
2008-05-27  5:59                               ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27  8:20                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27  8:35                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-06  5:03                                 ` Greg Smith
2008-06-06  6:13                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 11:38                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 12:50                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 13:07                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 14:16                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 16:16                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 17:56                                               ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 13:08                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 14:54                                         ` [patch part 2] " Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 16:12                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 17:53                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 18:19                                               ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 13:05                       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 13:35                         ` Mike Galbraith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-23 11:26 Anton Petrusevich
2008-05-23 18:46 ` Greg Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080522082814.GA4499@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gsmith@gregsmith.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox