The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel" <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: in-kernel DRM tree move around....
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:34:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080529113406.5d8f75c4@core> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212051908.8215.1255644495@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:05:08 +0200
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
> said:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> > tree in the kernel,
> > 
> > a) it lives under char.
> > b) everything in one directory.
> > c) header files in one directory.
> > d) no header files exposed to userspace.
> > 
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7df9a948d0f849466e3de259cccb49bc54cbad68
> > 
> > is a proposal to create drivers/gpu/drm, (I may move AGP in there as
> > well later). It also creates per-driver subdirs.
> 
> Looks like a lot more suitable place! I just wonder if drivers/video/drm
> would be even more logical?

I think gpu is better - we are seeing various GPU as CPU accelerator
toolkits appearing and assuming the AMD one ends up open source we will
end up with gpu/something that isn't video.

Remember GPU = Grahi^WGeneric Processing Unit ;)

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-29 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29  0:46 in-kernel DRM tree move around Dave Airlie
2008-05-29  4:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-29  5:23   ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-29  7:33     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-29  8:20   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-29  9:05 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-29 10:34   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-05-29 11:02 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-30  6:26   ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-30 16:58     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-29 19:41 ` Eric Anholt
2008-06-01 14:57 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080529113406.5d8f75c4@core \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox