From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:15:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080721141506.3720.93023.sendpatchset@prarit.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080721141501.3720.4565.sendpatchset@prarit.bos.redhat.com>
pci_alloc_consistent/dma_alloc_coherent is supposed to return size aligned
addresses.
>From Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt:
"pci_alloc_consistent returns two values: the virtual address which you
can use to access it from the CPU and dma_handle which you pass to the
card.
The cpu return address and the DMA bus master address are both
guaranteed to be aligned to the smallest PAGE_SIZE order which
is greater than or equal to the requested size. This invariant
exists (for example) to guarantee that if you allocate a chunk
which is smaller than or equal to 64 kilobytes, the extent of the
buffer you receive will not cross a 64K boundary."
Fix the GART's alloc_iommu code to return a size aligned address. Also fix
an incorrect alignment calculation in the iommu-helper code.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
index faf3229..329718e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
@@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ static unsigned long alloc_iommu(struct device *dev, int size)
spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu_bitmap_lock, flags);
offset = iommu_area_alloc(iommu_gart_bitmap, iommu_pages, next_bit,
- size, base_index, boundary_size, 0);
+ size, base_index, boundary_size, size - 1);
if (offset == -1) {
need_flush = 1;
offset = iommu_area_alloc(iommu_gart_bitmap, iommu_pages, 0,
- size, base_index, boundary_size, 0);
+ size, base_index, boundary_size,
+ size - 1);
}
if (offset != -1) {
set_bit_string(iommu_gart_bitmap, offset, size);
diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
index a3b8d4c..b970f1b 100644
--- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
+++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ again:
index = find_next_zero_bit(map, size, start);
/* Align allocation */
- index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
+ index = (index + align_mask + 1) & ~align_mask;
end = index + nr;
if (end >= size)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-21 14:15 [PATCH]: iommu fix potential overflow in alloc_iommu() Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-21 14:15 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2008-07-21 15:16 ` [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-21 15:16 ` [PATCH]: iommu fix potential overflow in alloc_iommu() FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-21 15:21 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-21 15:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-21 15:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080721141506.3720.93023.sendpatchset@prarit.bos.redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox