Re: HAVE_CLK (for <linux/clk.h> support)

[Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>]

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 06:05:19PM +0800, ext Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 05:48:14PM +0800, ext Bryan Wu wrote:
> >> Sorry for jumping in so later. I noticed Blackfin does not support
> >> HAVE_CLK currently.
> >> As the HAVE_CLK dependence is included in the kernel mainline, MUSB
> >> parts do not show up in the Kconfig because of lacking of HAVE_CLK.
> >>
> >> To implement clk infrastructure in Blackfin will be later than merging
> >> MUSB Blackfin parts to upstream.
> >>
> >> Any idea?
> >
> > dude, you're really late on this one. Now that musb depends on HAVE_CLK
> > and we have things working for that. What you can do is locally (on your
> > tree) remove the HAVE_CLK dependency so you can keep musb development
> > going. But don't push that patch upstream. Meanwhile, you'll have time
> > to implement clk framework support for blackfin.
> >
> 
> Too bad, I just realize this when I try to port my local blackfin
> patch for upstream merge.
> You're right, currently I remove the dependency locally. So I need to
> add a new task to implement clk framework for Blackfin.
> 
> OK, another question, do you know where is the latest usb development
> git tree, buddy?

I replied on the other mail :-)

It's a quilt tree on kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/

Just take a look at MAINTAINERS file ;-)

-- 
balbi