* ksoftirqd accounting broken in 2.6.27-rc9
@ 2008-10-08 17:37 Andi Kleen
2008-10-08 19:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-10-08 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On one test box running 2.6.27rc9 for a few hours I got:
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ? Ss 0:01 init [3]
2 ? S< 0:00 [kthreadd]
3 ? S< 0:00 [migration/0]
4 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]
5 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/0]
6 ? S< 0:00 [migration/1]
7 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
8 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/1]
9 ? S< 0:00 [migration/2]
10 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/2]
...
19 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/5]
...
25 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/7]
The other kernel threads seem to have correct accounting.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ksoftirqd accounting broken in 2.6.27-rc9
2008-10-08 17:37 ksoftirqd accounting broken in 2.6.27-rc9 Andi Kleen
@ 2008-10-08 19:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-08 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-08 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wednesday, 8 of October 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On one test box running 2.6.27rc9 for a few hours I got:
>
> PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
> 1 ? Ss 0:01 init [3]
> 2 ? S< 0:00 [kthreadd]
> 3 ? S< 0:00 [migration/0]
> 4 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]
> 5 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/0]
> 6 ? S< 0:00 [migration/1]
> 7 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
> 8 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/1]
> 9 ? S< 0:00 [migration/2]
> 10 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/2]
> ...
> 19 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/5]
> ...
> 25 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/7]
>
> The other kernel threads seem to have correct accounting.
It looks like http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209, doesn't it?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ksoftirqd accounting broken in 2.6.27-rc9
2008-10-08 19:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-08 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-10-08 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-kernel
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 of October 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On one test box running 2.6.27rc9 for a few hours I got:
>>
>> PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
>> 1 ? Ss 0:01 init [3]
>> 2 ? S< 0:00 [kthreadd]
>> 3 ? S< 0:00 [migration/0]
>> 4 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]
>> 5 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/0]
>> 6 ? S< 0:00 [migration/1]
>> 7 ? S< 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
>> 8 ? S< 0:00 [watchdog/1]
>> 9 ? S< 0:00 [migration/2]
>> 10 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/2]
>> ...
>> 19 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/5]
>> ...
>> 25 ? S< 21133795:38 [ksoftirqd/7]
>>
>> The other kernel threads seem to have correct accounting.
>
> It looks like http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209, doesn't it?
Yes, looks like a dup of that one. Thanks.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-08 20:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-08 17:37 ksoftirqd accounting broken in 2.6.27-rc9 Andi Kleen
2008-10-08 19:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-08 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox