The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, alan@redhat.com,
	jbaron@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: add an fsync tracer
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:53:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081106215310.GA15163@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1226003343.31966.43.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 15:19 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
> > 
> > > [...]
> > > what is the real need is
> > > 1) Have a trace point in the source
> > > 2) Associate a "formatting function" with that point 
> > >    (which basically transforms the trace parameters to, say, a string)
> > > 3) A way to turn the trace point on/off.
> > 
> > For 1 and 2, it may be worth considering a plain trace_mark() in
> > do_sync().  The complication that makes this uglier than a one-liner
> > is d_path()'s buffer and error handling.
> > 
> >     {
> >     char *buffer = kzalloc (4096, GFP_KERNEL);
> >     trace_mark(fsync, "Process %s is calling fsync on %s\n",
> >                        current->comm,
> >                        ({char *err = d_path (...);
> >                          IS_ERR(err) ? "?" : err;}));
> >     kfree (buffer);
> >     }
> > 
> > With a bit of extension on the marker front, the allocation could be
> > made conditional on the marker being enabled.
> > 
> > 
> > For 3, the kernel could merge a backend that connects arbitrary
> > markers to an ftrace (or whatever) buffer.  Several compact prototypes
> > for the latter exist.
> 
> 
> I prefer we keep using trace points but do what jason has been proposing
> for a while, which is add a format and arg list to the trace point
> definition.
> 
> Something like
> 
> DEFINE_TRACE_FMT(sched_switch,
> 	TPPROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
> 		 struct task_struct *next),
> 	TPARGS(rq, prev, next),
> 	TPFMT("%d to %d\n", prev->pid, next->pid));
> 
> Which would be similar to attaching a trace_mark() to the trace point
> and can in these cases save a lot of lines of code.
> 
> Both lttng and the ftrace event tracer can use these default text
> strings.
> 
> 

Argh. No, please. Doing this would end up exposing the inner kernel API
(the tracepoints) directly to userspace.

I've done an addition to the markers which does approximately the same.
It's in the -lttng tree now, I should post it soon.

A new marker type, trace_mark_tp() also takes a tracepoint name as
parameter. When the tracepoint is enabled, it also enables the
associated tracepoint. And it makes sure tracepoints are not exposed to
userspace.

Mathieu



-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-06 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-05 17:49 [PATCH] ftrace: add an fsync tracer Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-05 19:43 ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-11-05 20:36   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06  7:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 13:28   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-11-06 14:06   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06 14:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 14:31       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06 14:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 15:01           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06 15:34             ` Steven Rostedt
2008-11-06 17:45               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06 20:19                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-06 20:29                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 20:57                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-06 21:18                     ` Jason Baron
2008-11-06 21:53                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-11-06 22:14                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-06 22:25                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-06 23:25                           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-07  4:25                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-07  5:12                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-06 21:13                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-06 21:20                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-06 14:14   ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081106215310.GA15163@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox