The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: mtk.manpages@googlemail.com, roland@redhat.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	drepper@redhat.com, vegard.nossum@gmail.com,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_waitid: return -EFAULT for NULL
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:24:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113152457.0d7685ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfd18e0f0901131514i2f7be7f1t2c6275c26dbb6874@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:14:20 +1300
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> > It's always been invalid to call waitid() with a NULL pointer.  It was an
> > oversight that it was allowed (and acts like a wait4() call instead).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
> 
> Modulo the observation that this change will break any Linux-specific
> application that violate POSIX.1's requirement that infop not be NULL
> (*), and rely on the existing Linux behavior for
> waitd(idtype,id,NULL,options):
> 

Well yes.  waitid() has been in there since 2.6.9.  I assume that it
has had this wait4-emulation mode for that amount of time as well?

> 
> (*) It seems unlikely that such applications exist, and we really
> should make this change for POSIX.1 conformance.

Well, we might get away with it.  But formally speaking, we should live
with our Linux-specific screwup.

If we _are_ going to make this change then we should merge it as far
back in -stable as we can, to reduce the risk that people will develop
applications on kernel version A only to have then behave differently
on version B.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-13 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cfd18e0f0901131436ud2cf61bkf0e6b00f4b765bb5@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-13 22:38 ` waitid() return value strangeness when infop is NULL Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-13 22:43   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-13 22:47   ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-13 22:49     ` [PATCH] sys_waitid: return -EFAULT for NULL Roland McGrath
2009-01-13 23:14       ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-13 23:24         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-13 23:36           ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-13 23:47           ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-14  0:13             ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-14  0:24               ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-01-14  0:33       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-14  0:53         ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-14  0:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-14  1:39             ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-14  2:10               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-14  2:28                 ` Michael Kerrisk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090113152457.0d7685ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox