* 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux
@ 2009-01-16 8:21 Gene Heskett
2009-01-16 13:51 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-01-16 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
One of the things that was bugging me was that after having booted 2.6.29-rc1,
rebooting to 2.6.28 final always caused an automatic relabel, which on this
box with a bit over a terrabyte in drives, takes an extra 20 minutes to do.
So I grepped the .config's and there is no mention of SELINUX in the output of
a make oldconfig for 2.6.29-rc1, based on a 2.6.28 .config input.
I see the security/selinux directory still exists in the src tree. Is this a
kconfig bug, or is selinux outta here?
Thanks.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Bushydo -- the way of the shrub. Bonsai!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux
2009-01-16 8:21 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux Gene Heskett
@ 2009-01-16 13:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-01-16 13:58 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2009-01-16 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, James Morris, Eric Paris
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 03:21 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> One of the things that was bugging me was that after having booted 2.6.29-rc1,
> rebooting to 2.6.28 final always caused an automatic relabel, which on this
> box with a bit over a terrabyte in drives, takes an extra 20 minutes to do.
>
> So I grepped the .config's and there is no mention of SELINUX in the output of
> a make oldconfig for 2.6.29-rc1, based on a 2.6.28 .config input.
>
> I see the security/selinux directory still exists in the src tree. Is this a
> kconfig bug, or is selinux outta here?
Can you post your .config file?
selinux depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET
(possibly it should be using select instead of depends?)
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux
2009-01-16 13:51 ` Stephen Smalley
@ 2009-01-16 13:58 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2009-01-16 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, James Morris, Eric Paris
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:51 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 03:21 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > One of the things that was bugging me was that after having booted 2.6.29-rc1,
> > rebooting to 2.6.28 final always caused an automatic relabel, which on this
> > box with a bit over a terrabyte in drives, takes an extra 20 minutes to do.
> >
> > So I grepped the .config's and there is no mention of SELINUX in the output of
> > a make oldconfig for 2.6.29-rc1, based on a 2.6.28 .config input.
> >
> > I see the security/selinux directory still exists in the src tree. Is this a
> > kconfig bug, or is selinux outta here?
>
> Can you post your .config file?
> selinux depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET
>
> (possibly it should be using select instead of depends?)
Never mind the last part, already tried and rejected:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.1/0530.html
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-16 14:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-16 8:21 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux Gene Heskett
2009-01-16 13:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-01-16 13:58 ` Stephen Smalley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox