From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Balbir Singh" <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Record the current active power savings level
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:20:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090331105022.16414.4304.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090331104829.16414.11385.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>
The existing load balancer code is dependent on the sched_mc_power_savings
variable. However, on multi-core + multi-threaded machines, these decisions
need to be dependent on the values of both sched_mc_power_savings and
sched_smt_power_savings.
Create a new variable named active_power_savings_level which is the
maximum of the sched_mc_power_savings and sched_smt_power_savings.
Record this value in a read mostly global variable at the time when the user
changes the value of sched_mc/smt_power_savings tunable, and use it for
load-balancing decisions instead of computing it everytime.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 8 ++++++--
kernel/sched_fair.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8aaf276..1b1cab4 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ enum powersavings_balance_level {
};
extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
+extern enum powersavings_balance_level active_power_savings_level;
enum sched_domain_level {
SD_LV_NONE = 0,
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 706517c..07b774e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3450,7 +3450,7 @@ static inline int check_power_save_busiest_group(struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
*imbalance = sds->min_load_per_task;
sds->busiest = sds->group_min;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
+ if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
group_first_cpu(sds->group_leader);
}
@@ -4120,7 +4120,7 @@ redo:
!test_sd_parent(sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
return -1;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
+ if (active_power_savings_level < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
return -1;
if (sd->nr_balance_failed++ < 2)
@@ -7741,6 +7741,8 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span)
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
int sched_smt_power_savings = 0, sched_mc_power_savings = 0;
+/* Records the currently active power savings level */
+enum powersavings_balance_level __read_mostly active_power_savings_level;
/*
* The cpus mask in sched_group and sched_domain hangs off the end.
@@ -8575,6 +8577,8 @@ static ssize_t sched_power_savings_store(const char *buf, size_t count, int smt)
sched_smt_power_savings = level;
else
sched_mc_power_savings = level;
+ active_power_savings_level = max(sched_smt_power_savings,
+ sched_mc_power_savings);
arch_reinit_sched_domains();
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3816f21..02324d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
chosen_wakeup_cpu =
cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
+ if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
idle_cpu(cpu) && idle_cpu(this_cpu) &&
p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
cpu_isset(chosen_wakeup_cpu, p->cpus_allowed))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 10:50 [PATCH v4 0/5] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_power_savings framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(), sd_balance_for_*_power() Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-08-24 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Record the current active power savings level Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:12 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: Rename the variable sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: Arbitrate the nomination of preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090331105022.16414.4304.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox