The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Record the current active power savings level
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:20:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090331105022.16414.4304.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090331104829.16414.11385.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>

The existing load balancer code is dependent on the sched_mc_power_savings
variable. However, on multi-core + multi-threaded machines, these decisions
need to be dependent on the values of both sched_mc_power_savings and
sched_smt_power_savings.

Create a new variable named active_power_savings_level which is the
maximum of the sched_mc_power_savings and sched_smt_power_savings.

Record this value in a read mostly global variable at the time when the user
changes the value of sched_mc/smt_power_savings tunable, and use it for
load-balancing decisions instead of computing it everytime.

Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/sched.c        |    8 ++++++--
 kernel/sched_fair.c   |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8aaf276..1b1cab4 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ enum powersavings_balance_level {
 };
 
 extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
+extern enum powersavings_balance_level active_power_savings_level;
 
 enum sched_domain_level {
 	SD_LV_NONE = 0,
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 706517c..07b774e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3450,7 +3450,7 @@ static inline int check_power_save_busiest_group(struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
 	*imbalance = sds->min_load_per_task;
 	sds->busiest = sds->group_min;
 
-	if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
+	if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
 		cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
 			group_first_cpu(sds->group_leader);
 	}
@@ -4120,7 +4120,7 @@ redo:
 		    !test_sd_parent(sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
 			return -1;
 
-		if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
+		if (active_power_savings_level < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
 			return -1;
 
 		if (sd->nr_balance_failed++ < 2)
@@ -7741,6 +7741,8 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span)
 #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
 
 int sched_smt_power_savings = 0, sched_mc_power_savings = 0;
+/* Records the currently active power savings level */
+enum powersavings_balance_level __read_mostly active_power_savings_level;
 
 /*
  * The cpus mask in sched_group and sched_domain hangs off the end.
@@ -8575,6 +8577,8 @@ static ssize_t sched_power_savings_store(const char *buf, size_t count, int smt)
 		sched_smt_power_savings = level;
 	else
 		sched_mc_power_savings = level;
+	active_power_savings_level = max(sched_smt_power_savings,
+						sched_mc_power_savings);
 
 	arch_reinit_sched_domains();
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3816f21..02324d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 	chosen_wakeup_cpu =
 		cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
 
-	if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
+	if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
 		idle_cpu(cpu) && idle_cpu(this_cpu) &&
 		p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
 		cpu_isset(chosen_wakeup_cpu, p->cpus_allowed))


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-31 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-31 10:50 [PATCH v4 0/5] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_power_savings framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(), sd_balance_for_*_power() Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-08-24 16:09   ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Record the current active power savings level Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:12     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: Rename the variable sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: Arbitrate the nomination of preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-31 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090331105022.16414.4304.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox