From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Saving power by cpu evacuation using sched_mc=n
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:24:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090427055451.GF13342@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090427035216.GD10087@elte.hu>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 05:52:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Regarding the values for 2...5 - is the AvgPower column time
> normalized or workload normalized?
>
> If it's time normalized then it appears there's no power win here at
> all: we'd be better off by throttling the workload directly (by
> injecting sleeps or something like that), right?
Energy savings with this will depend on the workload running. We have
seen transactional workloads where taking off a few cores has almost
no impact on throughput or response time.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-27 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-26 20:46 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Saving power by cpu evacuation using sched_mc=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-26 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] sched: add more levels of sched_mc Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-26 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] sched: threshold helper functions Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-26 20:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] sched: loadbalancer hacks for forced packing of tasks Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-27 3:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Saving power by cpu evacuation using sched_mc=n Ingo Molnar
2009-04-27 5:43 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-27 5:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-27 6:39 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-27 7:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-27 5:54 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2009-04-27 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-27 14:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-28 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 16:15 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-04-28 16:11 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090427055451.GF13342@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox