Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Saving power by cpu evacuation using sched_mc=n

[Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2009-04-28 10:52:37]:

> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> 
> > > > Also, the user interface should be that single thermal 
> > > > capacity knob, more fine grained control is undesired.
> > > 
> > > For power savings, a single evacuation knob will do.  While for 
> > > thermal we will need additional parameters to choose the right 
> > > cores to evacuate.  Some sort of directional/vector parameter.
> > 
> > Why? are machines that non-uniform in cooling capacity that it 
> > really matters which core generates the heat? Sounds like badly 
> > designed hardware to me.
> > 
> > I would expect it to only be the total head generated/power taken 
> > from the rack unit.
> 
> If we add thermal throttling at the kernel level then a single knob 
> (with a percentile-ish unit) is probably the furthest we will go - 
> with "not doing it at all" still being the other, very tempting 
> alternative.

Sure, this is all we would like to do.  Simpler interface is welcome
and will have easy adoption.
 
> If the only technical way you can find to do it is via myriads of 
> non-intuitive knobs and per core settings - then the answer is 
> really 'no thanks'.

Agreed.  We definitely do not want to add myriads of non-intuitive
knobs.  Lets see if a percentage/capacity type knob will work for all.

Thanks,
Vaidy