[patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[David Brownell]

The 2.6.30-rc5 merges included a bunch of DaVinci platform
updates, including EDMA support.  Which means that finally
the ASoC stuff can be made to build in mainline ... it was
probably sent to mainline before its time.  ;)

Following are three patches which resync mainline ASoC code
with what's in the DaVinci tree.  I'd like to suggest they
all merge before 2.6.30-final ... two are build fixes, and
the third is needed to make it work.

(I'm cc'ing all interested parties -- except alsa-devel,
which is members-only -- on this note, but will only cc
the DaVinci list on the three patches.)

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[Takashi Iwai]

At Thu, 14 May 2009 12:35:35 -0700,
David Brownell wrote:
> 
> The 2.6.30-rc5 merges included a bunch of DaVinci platform
> updates, including EDMA support.  Which means that finally
> the ASoC stuff can be made to build in mainline ... it was
> probably sent to mainline before its time.  ;)
> 
> Following are three patches which resync mainline ASoC code
> with what's in the DaVinci tree.  I'd like to suggest they
> all merge before 2.6.30-final ... two are build fixes, and
> the third is needed to make it work.

The patches haven't been sent yet?


thanks,

Takashi

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[David Brownell]

On Friday 15 May 2009, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 14 May 2009 12:35:35 -0700,
> David Brownell wrote:
> > 
> > The 2.6.30-rc5 merges included a bunch of DaVinci platform
> > updates, including EDMA support.  Which means that finally
> > the ASoC stuff can be made to build in mainline ... it was
> > probably sent to mainline before its time.  ;)
> > 
> > Following are three patches which resync mainline ASoC code
> > with what's in the DaVinci tree.  I'd like to suggest they
> > all merge before 2.6.30-final ... two are build fixes, and
> > the third is needed to make it work.
> 
> The patches haven't been sent yet?

I just cc'd Mark and Liam, maintainers of the ASoC stuff,
and the DaVinci list ... 

  http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-May/013339.html
  http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-May/013338.html
  http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-May/013340.html

If you want to merge them I'll forward those to you.

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:21:16AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:

> If you want to merge them I'll forward those to you.

I've applied them all, a pull request will be going to Takashi in the
next couple of minutes.

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[Takashi Iwai]

At Fri, 15 May 2009 09:22:27 +0100,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:21:16AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > If you want to merge them I'll forward those to you.
> 
> I've applied them all, a pull request will be going to Takashi in the
> next couple of minutes.

Thanks.  I'm going to send a pull request to Linus today later
together with other fixes.


Takashi

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:35:35PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:

> The 2.6.30-rc5 merges included a bunch of DaVinci platform
> updates, including EDMA support.  Which means that finally
> the ASoC stuff can be made to build in mainline ... it was
> probably sent to mainline before its time.  ;)

I've applied all three patches.  Obviously they should all have been
merged much earlier but given that the code didn't even build there's
no risk of making the situation worse and they look fine.

> (I'm cc'ing all interested parties -- except alsa-devel,
> which is members-only -- on this note, but will only cc
> the DaVinci list on the three patches.)

In future I'd suggest not sending the cover letter to more recipients
than the actual patches, it just creates confusion.

Re: [patch 0/3] DaVinci ASoC updates

[David Brownell]

On Friday 15 May 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:35:35PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > The 2.6.30-rc5 merges included a bunch of DaVinci platform
> > updates, including EDMA support.  Which means that finally
> > the ASoC stuff can be made to build in mainline ... it was
> > probably sent to mainline before its time.  ;)
> 
> I've applied all three patches.

Thanks.


> Obviously they should all have been 
> merged much earlier but given that the code didn't even build there's
> no risk of making the situation worse and they look fine.

Yeah; I'm glad those updates managed to get into RC5.
Until they did, there wasn't much point in sending what
would likely have been an incomplete synch.