From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Michael Witten" <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Cc: "Johannes Stezenbach" <js@sig21.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Venkatesh Pallipadi" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.30: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907042329.04926.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a4f9af3.27015a0a.48c6.ffffa6d5@mx.google.com>
On Saturday 04 July 2009, Michael Witten wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:39:59 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg22661.html):
>
> > In fact, we need to do this entire thing differently.
> >
> > The basic problem is that cpufreq_suspend() is a sysdev thing, so it will
> > always be called with iterrupts off and *only* for CPU0. So, it looks like
> > the majority of things we do there is just unnecessary (at least).
>
> What's the status? This bug is driving me nuts.
Unfortunately, still unresolved.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-04 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cNtMS-6Iq-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNuzd-7VN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNHPT-3kB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNM3f-1ty-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNMZg-2ZR-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNNsg-3U5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNNLx-4kf-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNOeG-5cB-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNOok-5pJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cNOy0-5C5-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-07-04 18:09 ` 2.6.30: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Michael Witten
2009-07-04 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-07-06 21:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-06 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-06 22:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-15 23:27 Johannes Stezenbach
2009-06-16 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-16 14:22 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-06-16 18:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 19:57 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-06-16 20:25 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-16 20:40 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-06-16 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 21:18 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-16 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-16 22:44 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-06-16 20:44 ` Johannes Stezenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907042329.04926.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=js@sig21.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfwitten@gmail.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox