From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@morethan.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907081731.33106.lkml@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907081658260.22105-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed July 8 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Michael S. Zick wrote:
>
> > > Like I've been telling you all along, the hardware isn't working.
> > >
> >
> > That sounds very fragile.
>
> I'm not sure how to interpret that sentence. If you mean that your
> system's hardware design isn't good, I agree. If you mean that the
> kernel shouldn't produce a lot of output when faced with broken
> hardware, that's not so clear. What else should it do (bearing in mind
> that the kernel can't tell the hardware is broken)?
>
It is unlikely that VIA Tech. will recall the CX700 chipset.
So being able to take a device off-line (like the driver claims it is doing)
and *leave* it off-line - until told to "try again" - that would be an
improvement.
The current process of filling up the /var/log directory until the machine
chokes is a rather fragile sort of response to a hot-plugged device, good or bad.
> > > I suspect it's worse than a simple interrupt-routing mistake.
> > >
> >
> > I would not object to your removing that one mistake - that is one less
> > to contend with.
>
> I didn't say there was an interrupt-routing mistake; I said it was
> _worse_ than an interrupt-routing mistake.
>
Never claimed you did - the driver made that claim.
But still, it would be nice to get rid of the interrupt-routing mistake.
I suppose waiting for the OLPC project to find and fix the problem is
a viable alternative also.
You will not be the first to give up on this C7-M/CX700 combination. ;)
> > > > > > For more information enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, then
> > > > > > see what's sitting in the usb/uhci/* files in debugfs.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > Fours up-time - nothing written to dmesg since boot -
> > Just the usual hard-lockup.
> >
> > Also - something in the combined fix/diagnostic patch
> > disable any sensing of external usb events.
> > So I couldn't very well poke devices at it. ;)
>
> You should take out those BUG statements. If they ever trigger, they
> will certainly lock up your system.
>
Although I would expect that they not do so silently.
I take them out and just in time before starting the next
round of testing.
Mike
> Alan Stern
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-05 22:20 Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 9:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-07-07 14:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-07 14:32 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 15:10 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 15:23 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 15:31 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 15:43 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 17:28 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 17:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 19:21 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 19:51 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 20:00 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 20:52 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 21:24 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 19:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 14:43 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 16:30 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 16:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-11 19:07 ` uhci_hcd fails to off-line device/hub on error condition Michael S. Zick
2009-07-12 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 19:57 ` Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd Alan Stern
2009-07-08 20:22 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 21:02 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 22:31 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2009-07-09 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 23:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 23:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 14:20 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-09 14:46 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 15:08 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-09 16:07 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 20:58 ` Michael S. Zick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907081731.33106.lkml@morethan.org \
--to=lkml@morethan.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox