public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: "Leonidas ." <leonidas137@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can current macro be accessed from interrupt context?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:45:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022064538.25837421@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f22d86810910220410r33002b5ei403ddf6632254472@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:10:49 -0700
"Leonidas ." <leonidas137@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Going through UTLK, it says that current macro makes sense only in
> case of process context,
> in case of interrupt context it is invalid.
> 
> But current would still be pointing to interrupted process right? The
> pointer would still be valid?
> Can I safely assume that whether or not interrupt handlers are
> executing on separate stacks or
> interrupted threads stack, current macro can be accessed from
> interrupt context?

not for interrupt threads, and that's where things are moving to.

for interrupt stacks you ought to be fine (current is just a pointer on
the stack, and last I looked we copied that pointer for each interrupt
to the irq stack)

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-22 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 11:10 Can current macro be accessed from interrupt context? Leonidas .
2009-10-22 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-22 11:43   ` Leonidas .
2009-10-22 11:49     ` Leonidas .
2009-10-22 12:06     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-22 13:37       ` Leonidas .
2009-10-22 13:45 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-10-22 15:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-22 17:46   ` Leonidas .
2009-10-22 18:12     ` Leonidas .
2009-10-23  8:13     ` Clemens Ladisch
2009-10-23  9:34       ` Leonidas .

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091022064538.25837421@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=leonidas137@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox