public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:43:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091215174302.GA3928@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091214220320.665065925@quilx.com>

* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> Leftovers from the earlier patchset. Mostly applications of per cpu counters
> to core components.
> 
> After this patchset there will be only one user of local_t left: Mathieu's
> trace ringbuffer. Does it really need these ops?
> 

Besides my own ring buffer implementation in LTTng, at least Steven's
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c (in mainline) use this too. We would need a
way to directly map to the same resulting behavior with per-cpu
variables.

In LTTng, I use local_cmpxchg, local_read, local_add and, in some
setups, local_add_return to manage the write counter and commit
counters. These per-cpu counters are kept in per-cpu buffer management
data allocated for each data collection "channel".

The current way I allocate this structure for all cpus is:

  chan->buf = alloc_percpu(struct ltt_chanbuf);

But note that each struct ltt_chanbuf contains a pointer to an array
containing each sub-buffer commit counters for the given buffer:

struct commit_counters {
        local_t cc;
        local_t cc_sb;                  /* Incremented _once_ at sb switch */
        local_t events;                 /* Event count */
};

struct ltt_chanbuf {
        struct ltt_chanbuf_alloc a;     /* Parent. First field. */
        /* First 32 bytes cache-hot cacheline */
        local_t offset;                 /* Current offset in the buffer */
        struct commit_counters *commit_count;
                                        /* Commit count per sub-buffer */
        atomic_long_t consumed;         /*
                                         * Current offset in the buffer
                                         * standard atomic access (shared)
                                         */
....

So I think accessing the "local_t offset" through percpu pointers should
be fine if I allocate struct ltt_chanbuf through the per cpu API.
However, I wonder how to deal with the commit_count counters, because
there is an indirection level.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-14 22:03 [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  3:53   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 15:04     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16  0:53       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 14:55         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:23           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 2/8] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 3/8] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 4/8] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 5/8] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  6:24   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-15 14:46     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 14:59       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:03   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 22:41     ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 16:10       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:25         ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17  5:42           ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 8/8] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:04   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15  6:37 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Pekka Enberg
2009-12-15  6:47   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 14:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-12-16 14:44   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 21:36     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-12-16  0:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16  1:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16  1:46       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 13:39         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 19:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 20:25             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 20:43               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18  0:13                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-18  0:27                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091215174302.GA3928@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox