public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:13:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091218001357.GA30450@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912171443080.5819@router.home>

* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> > Some quick test on my Intel Xeon E5405:
> >
> > local cmpxchg:  14 cycles
> > xchg:           18 cycles
> >
> > So yes, indeed, the non-LOCK prefixed local cmpxchg seems a bit faster
> > than the xchg, given the latter has an implied LOCK prefix.
> >
> > Code used for local cmpxchg:
> >                 old = var;
> >                 do {
> >                         ret = cmpxchg_local(&var, old, 4);
> >                         if (likely(ret == old))
> >                                 break;
> >                         old = ret;
> >                 } while (1);
> >
> 
> Great. Could you also put that into "patch-format"?
> 

Sure, can you point me to a git tree I should work on top of which
includes the per cpu infrastructure to extend ?

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-18  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-14 22:03 [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  3:53   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 15:04     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16  0:53       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 14:55         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:23           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 2/8] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 3/8] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 4/8] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 5/8] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  6:24   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-15 14:46     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 14:59       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:03   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 22:41     ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 16:10       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:25         ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17  5:42           ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 8/8] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:04   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15  6:37 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Pekka Enberg
2009-12-15  6:47   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 14:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-12-16 14:44   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 21:36     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16  0:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16  1:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16  1:46       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 13:39         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 19:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 20:25             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 20:43               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18  0:13                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-12-18  0:27                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091218001357.GA30450@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox